| other,0-1-P89-1008,ak | other formal models have permitted . <term> | Conversationally relevant descriptions | </term> are <term> definite descriptions </term> | #20189 The model appears capable of accommodating the sort of reduplications that have been observed to occur in natural languages, but it excludes many of the unnatural constructions that other formal models have permitted.Conversationally relevant descriptions are definite descriptions that are not merely tools for the identification of a referent, but are also crucial to the discourse in other respects. | |
| other,4-1-P89-1008,ak | Conversationally relevant descriptions </term> are <term> | definite descriptions | </term> that are not merely tools for the | #20193 Conversationally relevant descriptions aredefinite descriptions that are not merely tools for the identification of a referent, but are also crucial to the discourse in other respects. | |
| other,16-1-P89-1008,ak | tools for the identification of a <term> | referent | </term> , but are also crucial to the <term> | #20205 Conversationally relevant descriptions are definite descriptions that are not merely tools for the identification of areferent, but are also crucial to the discourse in other respects. | |
| other,24-1-P89-1008,ak | </term> , but are also crucial to the <term> | discourse | </term> in other respects . I analyze the | #20213 Conversationally relevant descriptions are definite descriptions that are not merely tools for the identification of a referent, but are also crucial to thediscourse in other respects. | |
| other,6-2-P89-1008,ak | respects . I analyze the uses of such <term> | descriptions | </term> in <term> assertions </term> as conveying | #20224 I analyze the uses of suchdescriptions in assertions as conveying a particular type of conversational implicatures. | |
| other,8-2-P89-1008,ak | of such <term> descriptions </term> in <term> | assertions | </term> as conveying a particular type of | #20226 I analyze the uses of such descriptions inassertions as conveying a particular type of conversational implicatures. | |
| other,15-2-P89-1008,ak | </term> as conveying a particular type of <term> | conversational implicatures | </term> . Such <term> implicatures </term> can | #20233 I analyze the uses of such descriptions in assertions as conveying a particular type ofconversational implicatures. | |
| other,1-3-P89-1008,ak | conversational implicatures </term> . Such <term> | implicatures | </term> can be represented within the framework | #20237 Suchimplicatures can be represented within the framework of possible world semantics. | |
| other,9-3-P89-1008,ak | represented within the framework of <term> | possible world semantics | </term> . The analysis is extended to <term> | #20245 Such implicatures can be represented within the framework ofpossible world semantics. | |
| other,5-4-P89-1008,ak | </term> . The analysis is extended to <term> | non-assertive illocutionary acts | </term> on the one hand , and to <term> indefinite | #20254 The analysis is extended tonon-assertive illocutionary acts on the one hand, and to indefinite descriptions on the other. | |
| other,15-4-P89-1008,ak | acts </term> on the one hand , and to <term> | indefinite descriptions | </term> on the other . This article introduces | #20264 The analysis is extended to non-assertive illocutionary acts on the one hand, and toindefinite descriptions on the other. |
