We briefly investigate the weak equivalence of the two
<term>
formalisms
</term>
.
#16789We briefly investigate the weak equivalence of the twoformalisms.
other,13-3-P86-1011,ak
We then turn to a discussion comparing the
<term>
linguistic expressiveness
</term>
of the two
<term>
formalisms
</term>
.
#16804We then turn to a discussion comparing the linguistic expressiveness of the twoformalisms.
other,7-1-P86-1011,ak
We examine the relationship between the two
<term>
grammatical formalisms
</term>
:
<term>
Tree Adjoining Grammars
</term>
and
<term>
Head Grammars
</term>
.
#16770We examine the relationship between the twogrammatical formalisms: Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars.
tech,14-1-P86-1011,ak
We examine the relationship between the two
<term>
grammatical formalisms
</term>
:
<term>
Tree Adjoining Grammars
</term>
and
<term>
Head Grammars
</term>
.
#16777We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms: Tree Adjoining Grammars andHead Grammars.
other,8-3-P86-1011,ak
We then turn to a discussion comparing the
<term>
linguistic expressiveness
</term>
of the two
<term>
formalisms
</term>
.
#16799We then turn to a discussion comparing thelinguistic expressiveness of the two formalisms.
tech,10-1-P86-1011,ak
We examine the relationship between the two
<term>
grammatical formalisms
</term>
:
<term>
Tree Adjoining Grammars
</term>
and
<term>
Head Grammars
</term>
.
#16773We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms:Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars.