| other,0-1-P85-1024,ak | This paper outlines <term> Plume </term> as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending <term> Plume </term> to handle <term> passives </term> , <term> relative clauses </term> , and <term> interrogatives </term> in a general manner . <term> Intersentential elliptical utterances </term> occur frequently in <term> information-seeking dialogues </term> . | #15942 This paper outlines Plume as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending Plume to handle passives, relative clauses, and interrogatives in a general manner.Intersentential elliptical utterances occur frequently in information-seeking dialogues. | |
| other,6-1-P85-1024,ak | <term> Intersentential elliptical utterances </term> occur frequently in <term> information-seeking dialogues </term> . | #15948 Intersentential elliptical utterances occur frequently ininformation-seeking dialogues. | |
| other,9-2-P85-1024,ak | This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such <term> utterances </term> , including identification of the <term> speaker ' s </term><term> discourse goal </term> in employing the <term> fragment </term> . | #15960 This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting suchutterances, including identification of the speaker' s discourse goal in employing the fragment. | |
| other,15-2-P85-1024,ak | This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such <term> utterances </term> , including identification of the <term> speaker ' s </term><term> discourse goal </term> in employing the <term> fragment </term> . | #15966 This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such utterances, including identification of thespeaker ' s discourse goal in employing the fragment. | |
| other,18-2-P85-1024,ak | This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such <term> utterances </term> , including identification of the <term> speaker ' s </term><term> discourse goal </term> in employing the <term> fragment </term> . | #15969 This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such utterances, including identification of the speaker' sdiscourse goal in employing the fragment. | |
| other,23-2-P85-1024,ak | This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such <term> utterances </term> , including identification of the <term> speaker ' s </term><term> discourse goal </term> in employing the <term> fragment </term> . | #15974 This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such utterances, including identification of the speaker' s discourse goal in employing thefragment. | |
| other,12-3-P85-1024,ak | We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon <term> pragmatic information </term> , including <term> discourse content </term> and <term> conversational goals </term> , rather than upon precise <term> representations </term> of the preceding <term> utterance </term> alone . | #15988 We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance uponpragmatic information, including discourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the preceding utterance alone. | |
| other,16-3-P85-1024,ak | We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon <term> pragmatic information </term> , including <term> discourse content </term> and <term> conversational goals </term> , rather than upon precise <term> representations </term> of the preceding <term> utterance </term> alone . | #15992 We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, includingdiscourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the preceding utterance alone. | |
| other,19-3-P85-1024,ak | We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon <term> pragmatic information </term> , including <term> discourse content </term> and <term> conversational goals </term> , rather than upon precise <term> representations </term> of the preceding <term> utterance </term> alone . | #15995 We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, including discourse content andconversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the preceding utterance alone. | |
| other,26-3-P85-1024,ak | We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon <term> pragmatic information </term> , including <term> discourse content </term> and <term> conversational goals </term> , rather than upon precise <term> representations </term> of the preceding <term> utterance </term> alone . | #16002 We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, including discourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon preciserepresentations of the preceding utterance alone. | |
| other,30-3-P85-1024,ak | We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon <term> pragmatic information </term> , including <term> discourse content </term> and <term> conversational goals </term> , rather than upon precise <term> representations </term> of the preceding <term> utterance </term> alone . | #16006 We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, including discourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the precedingutterance alone. |
