| tech,4-2-P81-1033,ak | conforms to it . Ideally , such a <term> | parser | </term> will correct the <term> deviant input | #13895 Ideally, such aparser will correct the deviant input: sometimes, it will be unable to correct it at all; at other times, correction will be possible, but only to within a range of ambiguous possibilities. | |
| other,23-5-P81-1033,ak | techniques </term> for each type of <term> | construction | </term> , and specialized <term> ambiguity | #14011 Focused interaction of this kind is facilitated by a construction-specific approach to flexible parsing, with specialized parsing techniques for each type ofconstruction, and specialized ambiguity representations for each type of ambiguity that a particular construction can give rise to. | |
| other,27-5-P81-1033,ak | construction </term> , and specialized <term> | ambiguity representations | </term> for each type of <term> ambiguity </term> | #14015 Focused interaction of this kind is facilitated by a construction-specific approach to flexible parsing, with specialized parsing techniques for each type of construction, and specializedambiguity representations for each type of ambiguity that a particular construction can give rise to. | |
| model,12-6-P81-1033,ak | language development </term> by allowing a <term> | language definition | </term> that is natural in terms of the <term> | #14043 A construction-specific approach also aids in task-specific language development by allowing alanguage definition that is natural in terms of the task domain to be interpreted directly without compilation into a uniform grammar formalism, thus greatly speeding the testing of changes to the language definition. | |
| tech,7-6-P81-1033,ak | approach also aids in task-specific <term> | language development | </term> by allowing a <term> language definition | #14038 A construction-specific approach also aids in task-specificlanguage development by allowing a language definition that is natural in terms of the task domain to be interpreted directly without compilation into a uniform grammar formalism, thus greatly speeding the testing of changes to the language definition. | |
| other,21-6-P81-1033,ak | </term> that is natural in terms of the <term> | task domain | </term> to be interpreted directly without | #14052 A construction-specific approach also aids in task-specific language development by allowing a language definition that is natural in terms of thetask domain to be interpreted directly without compilation into a uniform grammar formalism, thus greatly speeding the testing of changes to the language definition. | |
| other,31-6-P81-1033,ak | directly without compilation into a <term> | uniform grammar formalism | </term> , thus greatly speeding the <term> | #14062 A construction-specific approach also aids in task-specific language development by allowing a language definition that is natural in terms of the task domain to be interpreted directly without compilation into auniform grammar formalism, thus greatly speeding the testing of changes to the language definition. | |
| other,6-1-P81-1033,ak | flexible <term> parser </term> can deal with <term> | input | </term> that deviates from its <term> grammar | #13875 A flexible parser can deal withinput that deviates from its grammar, in addition to input that conforms to it. | |
| other,19-3-P81-1033,ak | making it as easy as possible for the <term> | ambiguity | </term> to be resolved through consultation | #13952 This paper is concerned with such ambiguous situations, and with making it as easy as possible for theambiguity to be resolved through consultation with the user of the parser - we presume interactive use. | |
| tech,17-5-P81-1033,ak | flexible parsing </term> , with specialized <term> | parsing techniques | </term> for each type of <term> construction | #14005 Focused interaction of this kind is facilitated by a construction-specific approach to flexible parsing, with specializedparsing techniques for each type of construction, and specialized ambiguity representations for each type of ambiguity that a particular construction can give rise to. | |
| other,16-1-P81-1033,ak | <term> grammar </term> , in addition to <term> | input | </term> that conforms to it . Ideally , such | #13885 A flexible parser can deal with input that deviates from its grammar, in addition toinput that conforms to it. | |
| tech,30-3-P81-1033,ak | consultation with the user of the <term> | parser | </term> - we presume interactive use . We | #13963 This paper is concerned with such ambiguous situations, and with making it as easy as possible for the ambiguity to be resolved through consultation with the user of theparser - we presume interactive use. | |
| model,44-6-P81-1033,ak | <term> testing </term> of changes to the <term> | language definition | </term> . This paper proposes a series of | #14075 A construction-specific approach also aids in task-specific language development by allowing a language definition that is natural in terms of the task domain to be interpreted directly without compilation into a uniform grammar formalism, thus greatly speeding the testing of changes to thelanguage definition. | |
| lr,11-1-P81-1033,ak | input </term> that deviates from its <term> | grammar | </term> , in addition to <term> input </term> | #13880 A flexible parser can deal with input that deviates from itsgrammar, in addition to input that conforms to it. | |
| tech,2-1-P81-1033,ak | multi-strategy framework . A flexible <term> | parser | </term> can deal with <term> input </term> that | #13871 A flexibleparser can deal with input that deviates from its grammar, in addition to input that conforms to it. | |
| other,33-5-P81-1033,ak | representations </term> for each type of <term> | ambiguity | </term> that a particular <term> construction | #14021 Focused interaction of this kind is facilitated by a construction-specific approach to flexible parsing, with specialized parsing techniques for each type of construction, and specialized ambiguity representations for each type ofambiguity that a particular construction can give rise to. | |
| other,8-2-P81-1033,ak | <term> parser </term> will correct the <term> | deviant input | </term> : sometimes , it will be unable to | #13899 Ideally, such a parser will correct thedeviant input: sometimes, it will be unable to correct it at all; at other times, correction will be possible, but only to within a range of ambiguous possibilities. | |
| tech,39-6-P81-1033,ak | </term> , thus greatly speeding the <term> | testing | </term> of changes to the <term> language definition | #14070 A construction-specific approach also aids in task-specific language development by allowing a language definition that is natural in terms of the task domain to be interpreted directly without compilation into a uniform grammar formalism, thus greatly speeding thetesting of changes to the language definition. | |
| other,37-5-P81-1033,ak | <term> ambiguity </term> that a particular <term> | construction | </term> can give rise to . A construction-specific | #14025 Focused interaction of this kind is facilitated by a construction-specific approach to flexible parsing, with specialized parsing techniques for each type of construction, and specialized ambiguity representations for each type of ambiguity that a particularconstruction can give rise to. | |
| tech,12-5-P81-1033,ak | construction-specific approach to <term> | flexible parsing | </term> , with specialized <term> parsing techniques | #14000 Focused interaction of this kind is facilitated by a construction-specific approach toflexible parsing, with specialized parsing techniques for each type of construction, and specialized ambiguity representations for each type of ambiguity that a particular construction can give rise to. |
