| other,3-1-P80-1026,ak | interfaces </term> . When people use <term> | natural language | </term> in natural settings , they often | #13606 When people usenatural language in natural settings, they often use it ungrammatically, missing out or repeating words, breaking-off and restarting, speaking in fragments, etc.. | |
| other,19-1-P80-1026,ak | ungrammatically , missing out or repeating <term> | words | </term> , breaking-off and restarting , speaking | #13622 When people use natural language in natural settings, they often use it ungrammatically, missing out or repeatingwords, breaking-off and restarting, speaking in fragments, etc.. | |
| other,27-1-P80-1026,ak | breaking-off and restarting , speaking in <term> | fragments | </term> , etc . . Their human listeners are | #13630 When people use natural language in natural settings, they often use it ungrammatically, missing out or repeating words, breaking-off and restarting, speaking infragments, etc.. | |
| tech,2-3-P80-1026,ak | deviations with little difficulty . If a <term> | computer system | </term> wishes to accept <term> natural language | #13652 If acomputer system wishes to accept natural language input from its users on a routine basis, it must display a similar indifference. | |
| other,7-3-P80-1026,ak | computer system </term> wishes to accept <term> | natural language input | </term> from its users on a routine basis | #13657 If a computer system wishes to acceptnatural language input from its users on a routine basis, it must display a similar indifference. | |
| tech,9-4-P80-1026,ak | In this paper , we outline a set of <term> | parsing flexibilities | </term> that such a <term> system </term> should | #13684 In this paper, we outline a set ofparsing flexibilities that such a system should provide. | |
| tech,14-4-P80-1026,ak | parsing flexibilities </term> that such a <term> | system | </term> should provide . We go , on to describe | #13689 In this paper, we outline a set of parsing flexibilities that such asystem should provide. | |
| tool,6-5-P80-1026,ak | should provide . We go , on to describe <term> | FlexP | </term> , a <term> bottom-up pattern-matching | #13699 We go, on to describeFlexP, a bottom-up pattern-matching parser that we have designed and implemented to provide these flexibilities for restricted natural language input to a limited-domain computer system. | |
| tech,9-5-P80-1026,ak | on to describe <term> FlexP </term> , a <term> | bottom-up pattern-matching parser | </term> that we have designed and implemented | #13702 We go, on to describe FlexP, abottom-up pattern-matching parser that we have designed and implemented to provide these flexibilities for restricted natural language input to a limited-domain computer system. | |
| tech,21-5-P80-1026,ak | designed and implemented to provide these <term> | flexibilities | </term> for <term> restricted natural language | #13714 We go, on to describe FlexP, a bottom-up pattern-matching parser that we have designed and implemented to provide theseflexibilities for restricted natural language input to a limited-domain computer system. | |
| other,23-5-P80-1026,ak | these <term> flexibilities </term> for <term> | restricted natural language input | </term> to a <term> limited-domain computer | #13716 We go, on to describe FlexP, a bottom-up pattern-matching parser that we have designed and implemented to provide these flexibilities forrestricted natural language input to a limited-domain computer system. | |
| tech,29-5-P80-1026,ak | natural language input </term> to a <term> | limited-domain computer system | </term> . Robust <term> natural language interpretation | #13722 We go, on to describe FlexP, a bottom-up pattern-matching parser that we have designed and implemented to provide these flexibilities for restricted natural language input to alimited-domain computer system. |
