| tech,1-1-P80-1019,ak | </term> are also discussed . Current <term> | natural language interfaces | </term> have concentrated largely on determining | #13465 Currentnatural language interfaces have concentrated largely on determining the literal meaning of input from their users. | |
| other,10-1-P80-1019,ak | concentrated largely on determining the <term> | literal meaning | </term> of input from their users . While | #13474 Current natural language interfaces have concentrated largely on determining theliteral meaning of input from their users. | |
| tech,2-2-P80-1019,ak | input from their users . While such <term> | decoding | </term> is an essential underpinning , much | #13484 While suchdecoding is an essential underpinning, much recent work suggests that natural language interfaces will never appear cooperative or graceful unless they also incorporate numerous non-literal aspects of communication, such as robust communication procedures. | |
| tech,13-2-P80-1019,ak | underpinning , much recent work suggests that <term> | natural language interfaces | </term> will never appear cooperative or | #13495 While such decoding is an essential underpinning, much recent work suggests thatnatural language interfaces will never appear cooperative or graceful unless they also incorporate numerous non-literal aspects of communication, such as robust communication procedures. | |
| tech,34-2-P80-1019,ak | aspects of communication </term> , such as <term> | robust communication procedures | </term> . This paper defends that view , | #13516 While such decoding is an essential underpinning, much recent work suggests that natural language interfaces will never appear cooperative or graceful unless they also incorporate numerous non-literal aspects of communication, such asrobust communication procedures. | |
| other,12-3-P80-1019,ak | but claims that direct imitation of <term> | human performance | </term> is not the best way to implement | #13532 This paper defends that view, but claims that direct imitation ofhuman performance is not the best way to implement many of these non-literal aspects of communication; that the new technology of powerful personal computers with integral graphics displays offers techniques superior to those of humans for these aspects, while still satisfying human communication needs. | |
| other,55-3-P80-1019,ak | these aspects , while still satisfying <term> | human communication needs | </term> . The paper proposes <term> interfaces | #13575 This paper defends that view, but claims that direct imitation of human performance is not the best way to implement many of these non-literal aspects of communication; that the new technology of powerful personal computers with integral graphics displays offers techniques superior to those of humans for these aspects, while still satisfyinghuman communication needs. | |
| tech,3-4-P80-1019,ak | communication needs </term> . The paper proposes <term> | interfaces | </term> based on a judicious mixture of these | #13582 The paper proposesinterfaces based on a judicious mixture of these techniques and the still valuable methods of more traditional natural language interfaces. | |
| tech,20-4-P80-1019,ak | valuable methods of more traditional <term> | natural language interfaces | </term> . When people use <term> natural language | #13599 The paper proposes interfaces based on a judicious mixture of these techniques and the still valuable methods of more traditionalnatural language interfaces. |
