tech,4-1-P03-2036,bq |
</term>
. An empirical comparison of
<term>
|
CFG filtering techniques
|
</term>
for
<term>
LTAG
</term>
and
<term>
HPSG
|
#5112
An empirical comparison ofCFG filtering techniques for LTAG and HPSG is presented. |
other,6-2-P03-2036,bq |
demonstrate that an approximation of
<term>
|
HPSG
|
</term>
produces a more effective
<term>
CFG
|
#5128
We demonstrate that an approximation ofHPSG produces a more effective CFG filter than that of LTAG. |
other,11-2-P03-2036,bq |
HPSG
</term>
produces a more effective
<term>
|
CFG filter
|
</term>
than that of
<term>
LTAG
</term>
. We
|
#5133
We demonstrate that an approximation of HPSG produces a more effectiveCFG filter than that of LTAG. |
other,8-1-P03-2036,bq |
CFG filtering techniques
</term>
for
<term>
|
LTAG
|
</term>
and
<term>
HPSG
</term>
is presented
|
#5116
An empirical comparison of CFG filtering techniques forLTAG and HPSG is presented. |
other,10-1-P03-2036,bq |
techniques
</term>
for
<term>
LTAG
</term>
and
<term>
|
HPSG
|
</term>
is presented . We demonstrate that
|
#5118
An empirical comparison of CFG filtering techniques for LTAG andHPSG is presented. |
other,16-2-P03-2036,bq |
<term>
CFG filter
</term>
than that of
<term>
|
LTAG
|
</term>
. We also investigate the reason
|
#5138
We demonstrate that an approximation of HPSG produces a more effective CFG filter than that ofLTAG. |