| other,18-7-P03-1031,ak | sufficiently and that holding multiple <term> | candidates | </term> for <term> understanding results </term> | #4274 Experiment results have shown that a system that exploits the proposed method performs sufficiently and that holding multiplecandidates for understanding results is effective. | |
| other,5-4-P03-1031,ak | multiple <term> candidates </term> for <term> | understanding results | </term> and resolving the <term> ambiguity </term> | #4199 By holding multiple candidates forunderstanding results and resolving the ambiguity as the dialogue progresses, the discourse understanding accuracy can be improved. | |
| other,15-2-P03-1031,ak | based on the <term> context </term> of a <term> | dialogue | </term> . Since multiple <term> candidates </term> | #4154 This process enables the system to understand user utterances based on the context of adialogue. | |
| other,16-6-P03-1031,ak | method enables easy design of the <term> | discourse understanding process | </term> . Experiment results have shown that | #4252 Unlike conventional methods that use hand-crafted rules, the proposed method enables easy design of thediscourse understanding process. | |
| tech,19-3-P03-1031,ak | due to the <term> ambiguity </term> of <term> | speech understanding | </term> , it is not appropriate to decide | #4175 Since multiple candidates for the understanding result can be obtained for a user utterance due to the ambiguity ofspeech understanding, it is not appropriate to decide on a single understanding result after each user utterance. | |
| other,31-3-P03-1031,ak | appropriate to decide on a single <term> | understanding result | </term> after each <term> user utterance </term> | #4187 Since multiple candidates for the understanding result can be obtained for a user utterance due to the ambiguity of speech understanding, it is not appropriate to decide on a singleunderstanding result after each user utterance. |
