| tech,7-1-P03-1009,ak | Previous research has demonstrated the utility of <term> clustering </term> in inducing <term> semantic verb classes </term> from undisambiguated <term> corpus data </term> . | #3892 Previous research has demonstrated the utility ofclustering in inducing semantic verb classes from undisambiguated corpus data. | |
| other,10-1-P03-1009,ak | Previous research has demonstrated the utility of <term> clustering </term> in inducing <term> semantic verb classes </term> from undisambiguated <term> corpus data </term> . | #3895 Previous research has demonstrated the utility of clustering in inducingsemantic verb classes from undisambiguated corpus data. | |
| other,15-1-P03-1009,ak | Previous research has demonstrated the utility of <term> clustering </term> in inducing <term> semantic verb classes </term> from undisambiguated <term> corpus data </term> . | #3900 Previous research has demonstrated the utility of clustering in inducing semantic verb classes from undisambiguatedcorpus data. | |
| other,8-2-P03-1009,ak | We describe a new approach which involves clustering <term> subcategorization frame ( SCF ) distributions </term> using the <term> Information Bottleneck and nearest neighbour methods </term> . | #3911 We describe a new approach which involves clusteringsubcategorization frame ( SCF ) distributions using the Information Bottleneck and nearest neighbour methods. | |
| other,11-3-P03-1009,ak | In contrast to previous work , we particularly focus on clustering <term> polysemic verbs </term> . | #3937 In contrast to previous work, we particularly focus on clusteringpolysemic verbs. | |
| tech,2-4-P03-1009,ak | A novel <term> evaluation scheme </term> is proposed which accounts for the effect of <term> polysemy </term> on the <term> clusters </term> , offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguated <term> SCF data </term> . | #3942 A novelevaluation scheme is proposed which accounts for the effect of polysemy on the clusters, offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguated SCF data. | |
| other,12-4-P03-1009,ak | A novel <term> evaluation scheme </term> is proposed which accounts for the effect of <term> polysemy </term> on the <term> clusters </term> , offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguated <term> SCF data </term> . | #3952 A novel evaluation scheme is proposed which accounts for the effect ofpolysemy on the clusters, offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguated SCF data. | |
| other,15-4-P03-1009,ak | A novel <term> evaluation scheme </term> is proposed which accounts for the effect of <term> polysemy </term> on the <term> clusters </term> , offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguated <term> SCF data </term> . | #3955 A novel evaluation scheme is proposed which accounts for the effect of polysemy on theclusters, offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguated SCF data. | |
| other,31-4-P03-1009,ak | A novel <term> evaluation scheme </term> is proposed which accounts for the effect of <term> polysemy </term> on the <term> clusters </term> , offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguated <term> SCF data </term> . | #3971 A novel evaluation scheme is proposed which accounts for the effect of polysemy on the clusters, offering us a good insight into the potential and limitations of semantically classifying undisambiguatedSCF data. |
