| tech,5-1-N03-1026,bq | </term> . We present an application of <term> | ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques | </term> for <term> Lexical-Functional Grammars | #2789 We present an application ofambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques for Lexical-Functional Grammars (LFG) to the domain of sentence condensation. |
| other,12-1-N03-1026,bq | disambiguation techniques </term> for <term> | Lexical-Functional Grammars ( LFG ) | </term> to the domain of <term> sentence condensation | #2796 We present an application of ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques forLexical-Functional Grammars ( LFG ) to the domain of sentence condensation. |
| other,21-1-N03-1026,bq | Grammars ( LFG ) </term> to the domain of <term> | sentence condensation | </term> . Our <term> system </term> incorporates | #2805 We present an application of ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques for Lexical-Functional Grammars (LFG) to the domain ofsentence condensation. |
| tech,1-2-N03-1026,bq | <term> sentence condensation </term> . Our <term> | system | </term> incorporates a <term> linguistic parser/generator | #2809 Oursystem incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection. |
| tech,4-2-N03-1026,bq | Our <term> system </term> incorporates a <term> | linguistic parser/generator | </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> transfer | #2812 Our system incorporates alinguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection. |
| other,7-2-N03-1026,bq | linguistic parser/generator </term> for <term> | LFG | </term> , a <term> transfer component </term> | #2815 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator forLFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection. |
| tech,10-2-N03-1026,bq | parser/generator </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> | transfer component | </term> for <term> parse reduction </term> operating | #2818 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, atransfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection. |
| tech,13-2-N03-1026,bq | <term> transfer component </term> for <term> | parse reduction | </term> operating on <term> packed parse forests | #2821 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component forparse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection. |
| other,17-2-N03-1026,bq | parse reduction </term> operating on <term> | packed parse forests | </term> , and a <term> maximum-entropy model | #2825 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating onpacked parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection. |
| model,23-2-N03-1026,bq | packed parse forests </term> , and a <term> | maximum-entropy model | </term> for <term> stochastic output selection | #2831 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and amaximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection. |
| tech,26-2-N03-1026,bq | <term> maximum-entropy model </term> for <term> | stochastic output selection | </term> . Furthermore , we propose the use | #2834 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model forstochastic output selection. |
| tech,8-3-N03-1026,bq | Furthermore , we propose the use of standard <term> | parser evaluation methods | </term> for automatically evaluating the <term> | #2846 Furthermore, we propose the use of standardparser evaluation methods for automatically evaluating the summarization quality of sentence condensation systems. |
| other,15-3-N03-1026,bq | </term> for automatically evaluating the <term> | summarization | </term> quality of <term> sentence condensation | #2853 Furthermore, we propose the use of standard parser evaluation methods for automatically evaluating thesummarization quality of sentence condensation systems. |
| tech,18-3-N03-1026,bq | <term> summarization </term> quality of <term> | sentence condensation systems | </term> . An <term> experimental evaluation | #2856 Furthermore, we propose the use of standard parser evaluation methods for automatically evaluating the summarization quality ofsentence condensation systems. |
| tech,1-4-N03-1026,bq | sentence condensation systems </term> . An <term> | experimental evaluation | </term> of <term> summarization </term> quality | #2861 Anexperimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generated strings. |
| other,4-4-N03-1026,bq | <term> experimental evaluation </term> of <term> | summarization | </term> quality shows a close correlation | #2864 An experimental evaluation ofsummarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generated strings. |
| tech,12-4-N03-1026,bq | shows a close correlation between the <term> | automatic parse-based evaluation | </term> and a <term> manual evaluation </term> | #2872 An experimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between theautomatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generated strings. |
| other,17-4-N03-1026,bq | parse-based evaluation </term> and a <term> | manual evaluation | </term> of generated <term> strings </term> . | #2877 An experimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and amanual evaluation of generated strings. |
| other,21-4-N03-1026,bq | manual evaluation </term> of generated <term> | strings | </term> . Overall <term> summarization </term> | #2881 An experimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generatedstrings. |
| other,1-5-N03-1026,bq | generated <term> strings </term> . Overall <term> | summarization | </term> quality of the proposed <term> system | #2884 Overallsummarization quality of the proposed system is state-of-the-art, with guaranteed grammaticality of the system output due to the use of a constraint-based parser/generator. |
