Concordance

Query N03-1026 24 >
Shuffle 24 >
Random sample 24 (1,118.9 per million)

tech,4-2-N03-1026,bq	Our <term> system </term> incorporates a <term> linguistic parser/generator </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> transfer component </term> for <term> parse reduction </term> operating on <term> packed parse forests </term> , and a <term> maximum-entropy model </term> for <term> stochastic output selection </term> .	#2812 Our system incorporates alinguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection.
tech,26-2-N03-1026,bq	Our <term> system </term> incorporates a <term> linguistic parser/generator </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> transfer component </term> for <term> parse reduction </term> operating on <term> packed parse forests </term> , and a <term> maximum-entropy model </term> for <term> stochastic output selection </term> .	#2834 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model forstochastic output selection.
tech,8-3-N03-1026,bq	Furthermore , we propose the use of standard <term> parser evaluation methods </term> for automatically evaluating the <term> summarization </term> quality of <term> sentence condensation systems </term> .	#2846 Furthermore, we propose the use of standardparser evaluation methods for automatically evaluating the summarization quality of sentence condensation systems.
other,4-4-N03-1026,bq	An <term> experimental evaluation </term> of <term> summarization </term> quality shows a close correlation between the <term> automatic parse-based evaluation </term> and a <term> manual evaluation </term> of generated <term> strings </term> .	#2864 An experimental evaluation ofsummarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generated strings.
tech,1-4-N03-1026,bq	An <term> experimental evaluation </term> of <term> summarization </term> quality shows a close correlation between the <term> automatic parse-based evaluation </term> and a <term> manual evaluation </term> of generated <term> strings </term> .	#2861 Anexperimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generated strings.
tech,12-4-N03-1026,bq	An <term> experimental evaluation </term> of <term> summarization </term> quality shows a close correlation between the <term> automatic parse-based evaluation </term> and a <term> manual evaluation </term> of generated <term> strings </term> .	#2872 An experimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between theautomatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generated strings.
other,17-4-N03-1026,bq	An <term> experimental evaluation </term> of <term> summarization </term> quality shows a close correlation between the <term> automatic parse-based evaluation </term> and a <term> manual evaluation </term> of generated <term> strings </term> .	#2877 An experimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and amanual evaluation of generated strings.
other,12-1-N03-1026,bq	We present an application of <term> ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques </term> for <term> Lexical-Functional Grammars ( LFG ) </term> to the domain of <term> sentence condensation </term> .	#2796 We present an application of ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques forLexical-Functional Grammars ( LFG ) to the domain of sentence condensation.
tech,10-2-N03-1026,bq	Our <term> system </term> incorporates a <term> linguistic parser/generator </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> transfer component </term> for <term> parse reduction </term> operating on <term> packed parse forests </term> , and a <term> maximum-entropy model </term> for <term> stochastic output selection </term> .	#2818 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, atransfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection.
model,23-2-N03-1026,bq	Our <term> system </term> incorporates a <term> linguistic parser/generator </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> transfer component </term> for <term> parse reduction </term> operating on <term> packed parse forests </term> , and a <term> maximum-entropy model </term> for <term> stochastic output selection </term> .	#2831 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and amaximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection.
tech,1-2-N03-1026,bq	Our <term> system </term> incorporates a <term> linguistic parser/generator </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> transfer component </term> for <term> parse reduction </term> operating on <term> packed parse forests </term> , and a <term> maximum-entropy model </term> for <term> stochastic output selection </term> .	#2809 Oursystem incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating on packed parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection.
other,15-5-N03-1026,bq	Overall <term> summarization </term> quality of the proposed <term> system </term> is state-of-the-art , with guaranteed <term> grammaticality </term> of the <term> system output </term> due to the use of a <term> constraint-based parser/generator </term> .	#2898 Overall summarization quality of the proposed system is state-of-the-art, with guaranteed grammaticality of thesystem output due to the use of a constraint-based parser/generator.
other,1-5-N03-1026,bq	Overall <term> summarization </term> quality of the proposed <term> system </term> is state-of-the-art , with guaranteed <term> grammaticality </term> of the <term> system output </term> due to the use of a <term> constraint-based parser/generator </term> .	#2884 Overallsummarization quality of the proposed system is state-of-the-art, with guaranteed grammaticality of the system output due to the use of a constraint-based parser/generator.
other,21-1-N03-1026,bq	We present an application of <term> ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques </term> for <term> Lexical-Functional Grammars ( LFG ) </term> to the domain of <term> sentence condensation </term> .	#2805 We present an application of ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques for Lexical-Functional Grammars (LFG) to the domain ofsentence condensation.
tech,5-1-N03-1026,bq	We present an application of <term> ambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques </term> for <term> Lexical-Functional Grammars ( LFG ) </term> to the domain of <term> sentence condensation </term> .	#2789 We present an application ofambiguity packing and stochastic disambiguation techniques for Lexical-Functional Grammars (LFG) to the domain of sentence condensation.
tech,23-5-N03-1026,bq	Overall <term> summarization </term> quality of the proposed <term> system </term> is state-of-the-art , with guaranteed <term> grammaticality </term> of the <term> system output </term> due to the use of a <term> constraint-based parser/generator </term> .	#2906 Overall summarization quality of the proposed system is state-of-the-art, with guaranteed grammaticality of the system output due to the use of aconstraint-based parser/generator.
tech,6-5-N03-1026,bq	Overall <term> summarization </term> quality of the proposed <term> system </term> is state-of-the-art , with guaranteed <term> grammaticality </term> of the <term> system output </term> due to the use of a <term> constraint-based parser/generator </term> .	#2889 Overall summarization quality of the proposedsystem is state-of-the-art, with guaranteed grammaticality of the system output due to the use of a constraint-based parser/generator.
other,21-4-N03-1026,bq	An <term> experimental evaluation </term> of <term> summarization </term> quality shows a close correlation between the <term> automatic parse-based evaluation </term> and a <term> manual evaluation </term> of generated <term> strings </term> .	#2881 An experimental evaluation of summarization quality shows a close correlation between the automatic parse-based evaluation and a manual evaluation of generatedstrings.
tech,18-3-N03-1026,bq	Furthermore , we propose the use of standard <term> parser evaluation methods </term> for automatically evaluating the <term> summarization </term> quality of <term> sentence condensation systems </term> .	#2856 Furthermore, we propose the use of standard parser evaluation methods for automatically evaluating the summarization quality ofsentence condensation systems.
other,17-2-N03-1026,bq	Our <term> system </term> incorporates a <term> linguistic parser/generator </term> for <term> LFG </term> , a <term> transfer component </term> for <term> parse reduction </term> operating on <term> packed parse forests </term> , and a <term> maximum-entropy model </term> for <term> stochastic output selection </term> .	#2825 Our system incorporates a linguistic parser/generator for LFG, a transfer component for parse reduction operating onpacked parse forests, and a maximum-entropy model for stochastic output selection.


	in Help