| other,10-1-J87-1003,ak | trans-context-free on the basis of <term> | coordinations | </term> of the respectively type that involve | #17267 English is shown to be trans-context-free on the basis of coordinations of the respectively type that involve strictly syntactic cross-serial agreement. | |
| other,7-2-J87-1003,ak | question involves <term> number </term> in <term> | nouns | </term> and <term> reflexive pronouns </term> | #17286 The agreement in question involves number in nouns and reflexive pronouns and is syntactic rather than semantic in nature because grammatical number in English, like grammatical gender in languages such as French, is partly arbitrary. | |
| other,29-2-J87-1003,ak | <term> grammatical gender </term> in <term> | languages | </term> such as <term> French </term> , is partly | #17308 The agreement in question involves number in nouns and reflexive pronouns and is syntactic rather than semantic in nature because grammatical number in English, like grammatical gender in languages such as French, is partly arbitrary. | |
| other,49-3-J87-1003,ak | </term> one of whose members has fewer <term> | conjuncts | </term> than the other ; it thus goes through | #17366 The formal proof, which makes crucial use of the Interchange Lemma of Ogden et al., is so constructed as to be valid even if English is presumed to contain grammatical sentences in which respectively operates across a pair of coordinate phrases one of whose members has fewer conjuncts than the other; it thus goes through whatever the facts may be regarding constructions with unequal numbers of conjuncts in the scope of respectively, whereas other arguments have foundered on this problem. | |
| other,64-3-J87-1003,ak | whatever the facts may be regarding <term> | constructions | </term> with unequal numbers of <term> conjuncts | #17381 The formal proof, which makes crucial use of the Interchange Lemma of Ogden et al., is so constructed as to be valid even if English is presumed to contain grammatical sentences in which respectively operates across a pair of coordinate phrases one of whose members has fewer conjuncts than the other; it thus goes through whatever the facts may be regarding constructions with unequal numbers of conjuncts in the scope of respectively, whereas other arguments have foundered on this problem. | |
| other,69-3-J87-1003,ak | constructions </term> with unequal numbers of <term> | conjuncts | </term> in the <term> scope </term> of respectively | #17386 The formal proof, which makes crucial use of the Interchange Lemma of Ogden et al., is so constructed as to be valid even if English is presumed to contain grammatical sentences in which respectively operates across a pair of coordinate phrases one of whose members has fewer conjuncts than the other; it thus goes through whatever the facts may be regarding constructions with unequal numbers of conjuncts in the scope of respectively, whereas other arguments have foundered on this problem. | |
| other,78-3-J87-1003,ak | </term> of respectively , whereas other <term> | arguments | </term> have foundered on this problem . | #17395 The formal proof, which makes crucial use of the Interchange Lemma of Ogden et al., is so constructed as to be valid even if English is presumed to contain grammatical sentences in which respectively operates across a pair of coordinate phrases one of whose members has fewer conjuncts than the other; it thus goes through whatever the facts may be regarding constructions with unequal numbers of conjuncts in the scope of respectively, whereas other arguments have foundered on this problem. |
