| other,13-1-J86-4002,ak | human-machine interactions </term> in a <term> | natural language environment | </term> . Because a <term> speaker </term> and | #16589 The goal of this work is the enrichment of human-machine interactions in anatural language environment. | |
| other,21-7-J86-4002,ak | study and techniques for avoiding <term> | failures of reference | </term> . We want to illustrate a framework | #16715 This paper highlights a particular class of miscommunication --- reference problems --- by describing a case study and techniques for avoidingfailures of reference. | |
| other,10-3-J86-4002,ak | kinds of misunderstandings between <term> | speaker | </term> and <term> listener </term> , including | #16647 These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings betweenspeaker and listener, including reference failures or failure to understand the speaker's intention. | |
| other,7-7-J86-4002,ak | paper highlights a particular class of <term> | miscommunication | </term> --- <term> reference problems </term> | #16701 This paper highlights a particular class ofmiscommunication --- reference problems --- by describing a case study and techniques for avoiding failures of reference. | |
| other,4-4-J86-4002,ak | </term> . We call these misunderstandings <term> | miscommunication | </term> . Such mistakes can slow , and possibly | #16667 We call these misunderstandingsmiscommunication. | |
| tech,9-1-J86-4002,ak | of this work is the enrichment of <term> | human-machine interactions | </term> in a <term> natural language environment | #16585 The goal of this work is the enrichment ofhuman-machine interactions in a natural language environment. | |
| other,8-6-J86-4002,ak | goal is to recognize and isolate such <term> | miscommunications | </term> and circumvent them . This paper | #16689 Our goal is to recognize and isolate suchmiscommunications and circumvent them. | |
| other,10-5-J86-4002,ak | can slow , and possibly break down , <term> | communication | </term> . Our goal is to recognize and isolate | #16679 Such mistakes can slow, and possibly break down,communication. | |
| other,37-2-J86-4002,ak | difficulties and mistakes arise when a <term> | listener | </term> interprets a <term> speaker 's utterance | #16630 Because a speaker and listener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when alistener interprets a speaker's utterance. | |
| other,12-3-J86-4002,ak | misunderstandings between <term> speaker </term> and <term> | listener | </term> , including <term> reference failures | #16649 These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings between speaker andlistener, including reference failures or failure to understand the speaker's intention. | |
| other,2-2-J86-4002,ak | language environment </term> . Because a <term> | speaker | </term> and <term> listener </term> can not be | #16595 Because aspeaker and listener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when a listener interprets a speaker's utterance. | |
| other,19-8-J86-4002,ak | speaker </term> leeway in forming an <term> | utterance | </term> about a task and in determining the | #16738 We want to illustrate a framework less restrictive than earlier ones by allowing a speaker leeway in forming anutterance about a task and in determining the conversational vehicle to deliver it. | |
| other,4-2-J86-4002,ak | . Because a <term> speaker </term> and <term> | listener | </term> can not be assured to have the same | #16597 Because a speaker andlistener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when a listener interprets a speaker's utterance. | |
| other,14-8-J86-4002,ak | restrictive than earlier ones by allowing a <term> | speaker | </term> leeway in forming an <term> utterance | #16733 We want to illustrate a framework less restrictive than earlier ones by allowing aspeaker leeway in forming an utterance about a task and in determining the conversational vehicle to deliver it. | |
| other,9-7-J86-4002,ak | of <term> miscommunication </term> --- <term> | reference problems | </term> --- by describing a case study and | #16703 This paper highlights a particular class of miscommunication ---reference problems --- by describing a case study and techniques for avoiding failures of reference. | |
| other,8-9-J86-4002,ak | paper also promotes a new view for <term> | extensional reference | </term> . We examine the relationship between | #16760 The paper also promotes a new view forextensional reference. | |
| other,40-2-J86-4002,ak | a <term> listener </term> interprets a <term> | speaker 's utterance | </term> . These mistakes can lead to various | #16633 Because a speaker and listener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when a listener interprets aspeaker 's utterance. | |
| other,22-3-J86-4002,ak | </term> or failure to understand the <term> | speaker 's intention | </term> . We call these misunderstandings | #16659 These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings between speaker and listener, including reference failures or failure to understand thespeaker 's intention. | |
| other,15-3-J86-4002,ak | and <term> listener </term> , including <term> | reference failures | </term> or failure to understand the <term> | #16652 These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings between speaker and listener, includingreference failures or failure to understand the speaker's intention. |
