tech,13-5-J05-1003,bq We introduce a new <term> method </term> for the <term> reranking task </term> , based on the <term> boosting approach </term> to <term> ranking problems </term> described in <term> Freund et al. ( 1998 ) </term> .
other,16-5-J05-1003,bq We introduce a new <term> method </term> for the <term> reranking task </term> , based on the <term> boosting approach </term> to <term> ranking problems </term> described in <term> Freund et al. ( 1998 ) </term> .
other,20-5-J05-1003,bq We introduce a new <term> method </term> for the <term> reranking task </term> , based on the <term> boosting approach </term> to <term> ranking problems </term> described in <term> Freund et al. ( 1998 ) </term> .
tech,3-6-J05-1003,bq We apply the <term> boosting method </term> to <term> parsing </term> the <term> Wall Street Journal treebank </term> .
tech,6-6-J05-1003,bq We apply the <term> boosting method </term> to <term> parsing </term> the <term> Wall Street Journal treebank </term> .
lr-prod,8-6-J05-1003,bq We apply the <term> boosting method </term> to <term> parsing </term> the <term> Wall Street Journal treebank </term> .
tech,1-7-J05-1003,bq The <term> method </term> combined the <term> log-likelihood </term> under a <term> baseline model </term> ( that of <term> Collins [ 1999 ] </term> ) with evidence from an additional 500,000 <term> features </term> over <term> parse trees </term> that were not included in the original <term> model </term> .
other,4-7-J05-1003,bq The <term> method </term> combined the <term> log-likelihood </term> under a <term> baseline model </term> ( that of <term> Collins [ 1999 ] </term> ) with evidence from an additional 500,000 <term> features </term> over <term> parse trees </term> that were not included in the original <term> model </term> .
model,7-7-J05-1003,bq The <term> method </term> combined the <term> log-likelihood </term> under a <term> baseline model </term> ( that of <term> Collins [ 1999 ] </term> ) with evidence from an additional 500,000 <term> features </term> over <term> parse trees </term> that were not included in the original <term> model </term> .
other,12-7-J05-1003,bq The <term> method </term> combined the <term> log-likelihood </term> under a <term> baseline model </term> ( that of <term> Collins [ 1999 ] </term> ) with evidence from an additional 500,000 <term> features </term> over <term> parse trees </term> that were not included in the original <term> model </term> .
other,23-7-J05-1003,bq The <term> method </term> combined the <term> log-likelihood </term> under a <term> baseline model </term> ( that of <term> Collins [ 1999 ] </term> ) with evidence from an additional 500,000 <term> features </term> over <term> parse trees </term> that were not included in the original <term> model </term> .
other,25-7-J05-1003,bq The <term> method </term> combined the <term> log-likelihood </term> under a <term> baseline model </term> ( that of <term> Collins [ 1999 ] </term> ) with evidence from an additional 500,000 <term> features </term> over <term> parse trees </term> that were not included in the original <term> model </term> .
model,34-7-J05-1003,bq The <term> method </term> combined the <term> log-likelihood </term> under a <term> baseline model </term> ( that of <term> Collins [ 1999 ] </term> ) with evidence from an additional 500,000 <term> features </term> over <term> parse trees </term> that were not included in the original <term> model </term> .
tech,2-8-J05-1003,bq The new <term> model </term> achieved 89.75 % <term> F-measure </term> , a 13 % relative decrease in <term> F-measure </term> error over the <term> baseline model ’s score </term> of 88.2 % .
measure(ment),6-8-J05-1003,bq The new <term> model </term> achieved 89.75 % <term> F-measure </term> , a 13 % relative decrease in <term> F-measure </term> error over the <term> baseline model ’s score </term> of 88.2 % .
measure(ment),14-8-J05-1003,bq The new <term> model </term> achieved 89.75 % <term> F-measure </term> , a 13 % relative decrease in <term> F-measure </term> error over the <term> baseline model ’s score </term> of 88.2 % .
measure(ment),18-8-J05-1003,bq The new <term> model </term> achieved 89.75 % <term> F-measure </term> , a 13 % relative decrease in <term> F-measure </term> error over the <term> baseline model ’s score </term> of 88.2 % .
tech,6-9-J05-1003,bq The article also introduces a new <term> algorithm </term> for the <term> boosting approach </term> which takes advantage of the <term> sparsity of the feature space </term> in the <term> parsing data </term> .
tech,9-9-J05-1003,bq The article also introduces a new <term> algorithm </term> for the <term> boosting approach </term> which takes advantage of the <term> sparsity of the feature space </term> in the <term> parsing data </term> .
other,16-9-J05-1003,bq The article also introduces a new <term> algorithm </term> for the <term> boosting approach </term> which takes advantage of the <term> sparsity of the feature space </term> in the <term> parsing data </term> .
hide detail