This article considers approaches which rerank the output of an existing
<term>
probabilistic parser
</term>
.
#8025This article considers approaches which rerank the output of an existingprobabilistic parser.
tech,1-2-J05-1003,ak
The
<term>
base parser
</term>
produces a set of
<term>
candidate parses
</term>
for each
<term>
input sentence
</term>
, with associated
<term>
probabilities
</term>
that define an initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
of these
<term>
parses
</term>
.
#8029Thebase parser produces a set of candidate parses for each input sentence, with associated probabilities that define an initial ranking of these parses.
other,7-2-J05-1003,ak
The
<term>
base parser
</term>
produces a set of
<term>
candidate parses
</term>
for each
<term>
input sentence
</term>
, with associated
<term>
probabilities
</term>
that define an initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
of these
<term>
parses
</term>
.
#8035The base parser produces a set ofcandidate parses for each input sentence, with associated probabilities that define an initial ranking of these parses.
other,11-2-J05-1003,ak
The
<term>
base parser
</term>
produces a set of
<term>
candidate parses
</term>
for each
<term>
input sentence
</term>
, with associated
<term>
probabilities
</term>
that define an initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
of these
<term>
parses
</term>
.
#8039The base parser produces a set of candidate parses for eachinput sentence, with associated probabilities that define an initial ranking of these parses.
other,16-2-J05-1003,ak
The
<term>
base parser
</term>
produces a set of
<term>
candidate parses
</term>
for each
<term>
input sentence
</term>
, with associated
<term>
probabilities
</term>
that define an initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
of these
<term>
parses
</term>
.
#8044The base parser produces a set of candidate parses for each input sentence, with associatedprobabilities that define an initial ranking of these parses.
other,21-2-J05-1003,ak
The
<term>
base parser
</term>
produces a set of
<term>
candidate parses
</term>
for each
<term>
input sentence
</term>
, with associated
<term>
probabilities
</term>
that define an initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
of these
<term>
parses
</term>
.
#8049The base parser produces a set of candidate parses for each input sentence, with associated probabilities that define an initialranking of these parses.
other,24-2-J05-1003,ak
The
<term>
base parser
</term>
produces a set of
<term>
candidate parses
</term>
for each
<term>
input sentence
</term>
, with associated
<term>
probabilities
</term>
that define an initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
of these
<term>
parses
</term>
.
#8052The base parser produces a set of candidate parses for each input sentence, with associated probabilities that define an initial ranking of theseparses.
model,2-3-J05-1003,ak
A second
<term>
model
</term>
then attempts to improve upon this initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
, using additional
<term>
features
</term>
of the
<term>
tree
</term>
as evidence .
#8056A secondmodel then attempts to improve upon this initial ranking, using additional features of the tree as evidence.
other,10-3-J05-1003,ak
A second
<term>
model
</term>
then attempts to improve upon this initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
, using additional
<term>
features
</term>
of the
<term>
tree
</term>
as evidence .
#8064A second model then attempts to improve upon this initialranking, using additional features of the tree as evidence.
other,14-3-J05-1003,ak
A second
<term>
model
</term>
then attempts to improve upon this initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
, using additional
<term>
features
</term>
of the
<term>
tree
</term>
as evidence .
#8068A second model then attempts to improve upon this initial ranking, using additionalfeatures of the tree as evidence.
other,17-3-J05-1003,ak
A second
<term>
model
</term>
then attempts to improve upon this initial
<term>
ranking
</term>
, using additional
<term>
features
</term>
of the
<term>
tree
</term>
as evidence .
#8071A second model then attempts to improve upon this initial ranking, using additional features of thetree as evidence.
other,10-4-J05-1003,ak
The strength of our approach is that it allows a
<term>
tree
</term>
to be represented as an arbitrary set of
<term>
features
</term>
, without concerns about how these
<term>
features
</term>
interact or overlap and without the need to define a
<term>
derivation
</term>
or a
<term>
generative model
</term>
which takes these
<term>
features
</term>
into account .
#8085The strength of our approach is that it allows atree to be represented as an arbitrary set of features, without concerns about how these features interact or overlap and without the need to define a derivation or a generative model which takes these features into account.
other,19-4-J05-1003,ak
The strength of our approach is that it allows a
<term>
tree
</term>
to be represented as an arbitrary set of
<term>
features
</term>
, without concerns about how these
<term>
features
</term>
interact or overlap and without the need to define a
<term>
derivation
</term>
or a
<term>
generative model
</term>
which takes these
<term>
features
</term>
into account .
#8094The strength of our approach is that it allows a tree to be represented as an arbitrary set offeatures, without concerns about how these features interact or overlap and without the need to define a derivation or a generative model which takes these features into account.
other,26-4-J05-1003,ak
The strength of our approach is that it allows a
<term>
tree
</term>
to be represented as an arbitrary set of
<term>
features
</term>
, without concerns about how these
<term>
features
</term>
interact or overlap and without the need to define a
<term>
derivation
</term>
or a
<term>
generative model
</term>
which takes these
<term>
features
</term>
into account .
#8101The strength of our approach is that it allows a tree to be represented as an arbitrary set of features, without concerns about how thesefeatures interact or overlap and without the need to define a derivation or a generative model which takes these features into account.
other,37-4-J05-1003,ak
The strength of our approach is that it allows a
<term>
tree
</term>
to be represented as an arbitrary set of
<term>
features
</term>
, without concerns about how these
<term>
features
</term>
interact or overlap and without the need to define a
<term>
derivation
</term>
or a
<term>
generative model
</term>
which takes these
<term>
features
</term>
into account .
#8112The strength of our approach is that it allows a tree to be represented as an arbitrary set of features, without concerns about how these features interact or overlap and without the need to define aderivation or a generative model which takes these features into account.
model,40-4-J05-1003,ak
The strength of our approach is that it allows a
<term>
tree
</term>
to be represented as an arbitrary set of
<term>
features
</term>
, without concerns about how these
<term>
features
</term>
interact or overlap and without the need to define a
<term>
derivation
</term>
or a
<term>
generative model
</term>
which takes these
<term>
features
</term>
into account .
#8115The strength of our approach is that it allows a tree to be represented as an arbitrary set of features, without concerns about how these features interact or overlap and without the need to define a derivation or agenerative model which takes these features into account.
other,45-4-J05-1003,ak
The strength of our approach is that it allows a
<term>
tree
</term>
to be represented as an arbitrary set of
<term>
features
</term>
, without concerns about how these
<term>
features
</term>
interact or overlap and without the need to define a
<term>
derivation
</term>
or a
<term>
generative model
</term>
which takes these
<term>
features
</term>
into account .
#8120The strength of our approach is that it allows a tree to be represented as an arbitrary set of features, without concerns about how these features interact or overlap and without the need to define a derivation or a generative model which takes thesefeatures into account.
other,7-5-J05-1003,ak
We introduce a new method for the
<term>
reranking task
</term>
, based on the
<term>
boosting approach to ranking problems
</term>
described in Freund et al. ( 1998 ) .
#8131We introduce a new method for thereranking task, based on the boosting approach to ranking problems described in Freund et al. (1998).
tech,13-5-J05-1003,ak
We introduce a new method for the
<term>
reranking task
</term>
, based on the
<term>
boosting approach to ranking problems
</term>
described in Freund et al. ( 1998 ) .
#8137We introduce a new method for the reranking task, based on theboosting approach to ranking problems described in Freund et al. (1998).
tech,3-6-J05-1003,ak
We apply the
<term>
boosting method
</term>
to parsing the
<term>
Wall Street Journal treebank
</term>
.
#8154We apply theboosting method to parsing the Wall Street Journal treebank.