#7568We propose a method that automatically generatesparaphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
other,10-1-I05-5008,ak
generates
<term>
paraphrase sets
</term>
from
<term>
seed sentences
</term>
to be used as
<term>
reference sets
#7571We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets fromseed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
other,16-1-I05-5008,ak
seed sentences
</term>
to be used as
<term>
reference sets
</term>
in
<term>
objective machine translation
#7577We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used asreference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
measure(ment),19-1-I05-5008,ak
used as
<term>
reference sets
</term>
in
<term>
objective machine translation evaluation measures
</term>
like
<term>
BLEU
</term>
and
<term>
NIST
#7580We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets inobjective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
measure(ment),25-1-I05-5008,ak
translation evaluation measures
</term>
like
<term>
BLEU
</term>
and
<term>
NIST
</term>
. We measured
#7586We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures likeBLEU and NIST.
measure(ment),27-1-I05-5008,ak
measures
</term>
like
<term>
BLEU
</term>
and
<term>
NIST
</term>
. We measured the quality of the
<term>
#7588We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU andNIST.
other,6-2-I05-5008,ak
</term>
. We measured the quality of the
<term>
paraphrases
</term>
produced in an experiment , i.e.
#7596We measured the quality of theparaphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,18-2-I05-5008,ak
an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their
<term>
grammaticality
</term>
: at least 99 % correct sentences
#7608We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) theirgrammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,33-2-I05-5008,ak
) their
<term>
equivalence
</term>
in
<term>
meaning
</term>
: at least 96 % correct
<term>
paraphrases
#7623We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence inmeaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,40-2-I05-5008,ak
meaning
</term>
: at least 96 % correct
<term>
paraphrases
</term>
either by
<term>
meaning equivalence
#7630We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correctparaphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,43-2-I05-5008,ak
correct
<term>
paraphrases
</term>
either by
<term>
meaning equivalence
</term>
or
<term>
entailment
</term>
; and ,
#7633We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either bymeaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,46-2-I05-5008,ak
<term>
meaning equivalence
</term>
or
<term>
entailment
</term>
; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal
#7636We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence orentailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,57-2-I05-5008,ak
and , ( iii ) the amount of internal
<term>
lexical and syntactical variation
</term>
in a set of
<term>
paraphrases
</term>
#7647We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internallexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,65-2-I05-5008,ak
syntactical variation
</term>
in a set of
<term>
paraphrases
</term>
: slightly superior to that of hand-produced
#7655We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set ofparaphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,1-3-I05-5008,ak
to that of hand-produced sets . The
<term>
paraphrase sets
</term>
produced by this method thus seem
#7666Theparaphrase sets produced by this method thus seem adequate as reference sets to be used for MT evaluation.
other,11-3-I05-5008,ak
this method thus seem adequate as
<term>
reference sets
</term>
to be used for
<term>
MT evaluation
#7676The paraphrase sets produced by this method thus seem adequate asreference sets to be used for MT evaluation.
measure(ment),17-3-I05-5008,ak
reference sets
</term>
to be used for
<term>
MT evaluation
</term>
. This paper presents an
<term>
evaluation
#7682The paraphrase sets produced by this method thus seem adequate as reference sets to be used forMT evaluation.