Concordance

Query I05-5008 18 (576.3 per million)

other,7-1-I05-5008,ak	We propose a method that automatically generates <term> paraphrase sets </term> from <term> seed sentences </term> to be used as <term> reference sets </term> in <term> objective machine translation evaluation measures </term> like <term> BLEU </term> and <term> NIST </term> .	#7568 We propose a method that automatically generatesparaphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
other,10-1-I05-5008,ak	We propose a method that automatically generates <term> paraphrase sets </term> from <term> seed sentences </term> to be used as <term> reference sets </term> in <term> objective machine translation evaluation measures </term> like <term> BLEU </term> and <term> NIST </term> .	#7571 We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets fromseed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
other,16-1-I05-5008,ak	We propose a method that automatically generates <term> paraphrase sets </term> from <term> seed sentences </term> to be used as <term> reference sets </term> in <term> objective machine translation evaluation measures </term> like <term> BLEU </term> and <term> NIST </term> .	#7577 We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used asreference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
measure(ment),19-1-I05-5008,ak	We propose a method that automatically generates <term> paraphrase sets </term> from <term> seed sentences </term> to be used as <term> reference sets </term> in <term> objective machine translation evaluation measures </term> like <term> BLEU </term> and <term> NIST </term> .	#7580 We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets inobjective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU and NIST.
measure(ment),25-1-I05-5008,ak	We propose a method that automatically generates <term> paraphrase sets </term> from <term> seed sentences </term> to be used as <term> reference sets </term> in <term> objective machine translation evaluation measures </term> like <term> BLEU </term> and <term> NIST </term> .	#7586 We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures likeBLEU and NIST.
measure(ment),27-1-I05-5008,ak	We propose a method that automatically generates <term> paraphrase sets </term> from <term> seed sentences </term> to be used as <term> reference sets </term> in <term> objective machine translation evaluation measures </term> like <term> BLEU </term> and <term> NIST </term> .	#7588 We propose a method that automatically generates paraphrase sets from seed sentences to be used as reference sets in objective machine translation evaluation measures like BLEU andNIST.
other,6-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7596 We measured the quality of theparaphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,18-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7608 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) theirgrammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,31-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7621 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) theirequivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,33-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7623 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence inmeaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,40-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7630 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correctparaphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,43-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7633 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either bymeaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,46-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7636 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence orentailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,57-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7647 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internallexical and syntactical variation in a set of paraphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,65-2-I05-5008,ak	We measured the quality of the <term> paraphrases </term> produced in an experiment , i.e. , ( i ) their <term> grammaticality </term> : at least 99 % correct sentences ; ( ii ) their <term> equivalence </term> in <term> meaning </term> : at least 96 % correct <term> paraphrases </term> either by <term> meaning equivalence </term> or <term> entailment </term> ; and , ( iii ) the amount of internal <term> lexical and syntactical variation </term> in a set of <term> paraphrases </term> : slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets .	#7655 We measured the quality of the paraphrases produced in an experiment, i.e., (i) their grammaticality: at least 99% correct sentences; (ii) their equivalence in meaning: at least 96% correct paraphrases either by meaning equivalence or entailment; and, (iii) the amount of internal lexical and syntactical variation in a set ofparaphrases: slightly superior to that of hand-produced sets.
other,1-3-I05-5008,ak	The <term> paraphrase sets </term> produced by this method thus seem adequate as <term> reference sets </term> to be used for <term> MT evaluation </term> .	#7666 Theparaphrase sets produced by this method thus seem adequate as reference sets to be used for MT evaluation.
other,11-3-I05-5008,ak	The <term> paraphrase sets </term> produced by this method thus seem adequate as <term> reference sets </term> to be used for <term> MT evaluation </term> .	#7676 The paraphrase sets produced by this method thus seem adequate asreference sets to be used for MT evaluation.
measure(ment),17-3-I05-5008,ak	The <term> paraphrase sets </term> produced by this method thus seem adequate as <term> reference sets </term> to be used for <term> MT evaluation </term> .	#7682 The paraphrase sets produced by this method thus seem adequate as reference sets to be used forMT evaluation.


	in Help