other,28-3-I05-5003,bq |
matches and non-matches
</term>
in the
<term>
|
sentence
|
</term>
. Our results show that
<term>
MT
|
#8395
We also introduce a novel classification method based on PER which leverages part of speech information of the words contributing to the word matches and non-matches in the sentence . |
tech,21-4-I05-5003,bq |
classification
</term>
and to a lesser extent
<term>
|
entailment
|
</term>
. Our
<term>
technique
</term>
gives
|
#8418
Our results show that MT evaluation techniques are able to produce useful features for paraphrase classification and to a lesser extent entailment . |
tech,1-5-I05-5003,bq |
extent
<term>
entailment
</term>
. Our
<term>
|
technique
|
</term>
gives a substantial improvement
|
#8421
Our technique gives a substantial improvement in paraphrase classification accuracy over all of the other models used in the experiments. |
measure(ment),9-3-I05-5003,bq |
classification method
</term>
based on
<term>
|
PER
|
</term>
which leverages
<term>
part of speech
|
#8376
We also introduce a novel classification method based on PER which leverages part of speech information of the words contributing to the word matches and non-matches in the sentence. |
other,28-2-I05-5003,bq |
<term>
semantic equivalence
</term>
and
<term>
|
entailment
|
</term>
. We also introduce a novel
<term>
|
#8365
This paper investigates the utility of applying standard MT evaluation methods (BLEU, NIST, WER and PER) to building classifiers to predict semantic equivalence and entailment . |