| tech,10-4-H92-1060,bq | the degree of success of the robust <term> | parsing mechanism | </term> through a breakdown of the <term> performance | #19445 We have assessed the degree of success of the robustparsing mechanism through a breakdown of the performance of robustly parsed vs. fully parsed sentences on the October '91 dry-run test set. |
| other,1-2-H92-1060,bq | linguistic analysis </term> fails . This <term> | robust parsing capability | </term> was achieved through minor extensions | #19365 Thisrobust parsing capability was achieved through minor extensions of pre-existing components already in place for the full linguistic analysis component. |
| tech,22-5-H92-1060,bq | correctly , as over a third of the <term> | sentences | </term> were not covered by the <term> grammar | #19490 It was clear that the robust parser allowed us to answer many more questions correctly, as over a third of thesentences were not covered by the grammar. |
| tech,23-1-H92-1060,bq | </term> , which allows it to answer a <term> | question | </term> when a full <term> linguistic analysis | #19356 This paper describes an extension to the MIT ATIS (Air Travel Information Service) system, which allows it to answer aquestion when a full linguistic analysis fails. |
