Concordance

Query H90-1060 38 >
Shuffle 38 (1,771.6 per million)

other,31-2-H90-1060,bq	amount of <term> speech </term> from a few <term>	speakers	</term> instead of the traditional practice	#17019 First, we present a new paradigm for speaker-independent (SI) training of hidden Markov models (HMM), which uses a large amount of speech from a fewspeakers instead of the traditional practice of using a little speech from many speakers.
measure(ment),1-8-H90-1060,bq	the <term> target speaker </term> . Each <term>	reference model	</term> is transformed to the <term> space </term>	#17171 Eachreference model is transformed to the space of the target speaker and combined by averaging.
other,31-3-H90-1060,bq	the <term> speech data </term> from many <term>	speakers	</term> prior to <term> training </term> . With	#17065 In addition, combination of the training speakers is done by averaging the statistics> of independently trained models rather than the usual pooling of all the speech data from manyspeakers prior to training.
measure(ment),14-4-H90-1060,bq	recognition </term> , we achieved a 7.5 % <term>	word error rate	</term> on a standard <term> grammar </term>	#17084 With only 12 training speakers for SI recognition, we achieved a 7.5%word error rate on a standard grammar and test set from the DARPA Resource Management corpus.
other,30-6-H90-1060,bq	speech </term> from the new ( target ) <term>	speaker	</term> . A <term> probabilistic spectral mapping	#17149 Second, we show a significant improvement for speaker adaptation (SA) using the new SI corpus and a small amount of speech from the new (target)speaker.
measure(ment),12-9-H90-1060,bq	</term> for <term> adaptation </term> , the <term>	error rate	</term> dropped to 4.1 % --- a 45 % reduction	#17199 Using only 40 utterances from the target speaker for adaptation, theerror rate dropped to 4.1% --- a 45% reduction in error compared to the SI result.
lr,22-4-H90-1060,bq	a standard <term> grammar </term> and <term>	test set	</term> from the <term> DARPA Resource Management	#17092 With only 12 training speakers for SI recognition, we achieved a 7.5% word error rate on a standard grammar andtest set from the DARPA Resource Management corpus.
other,24-9-H90-1060,bq	dropped to 4.1 % --- a 45 % reduction in <term>	error	</term> compared to the <term> SI </term> result	#17211 Using only 40 utterances from the target speaker for adaptation, the error rate dropped to 4.1% --- a 45% reduction inerror compared to the SI result.
other,9-7-H90-1060,bq	is estimated independently for each <term>	training ( reference ) speaker	</term> and the <term> target speaker </term>	#17160 A probabilistic spectral mapping is estimated independently for eachtraining ( reference ) speaker and the target speaker.
tech,15-8-H90-1060,bq	target speaker </term> and combined by <term>	averaging	</term> . Using only 40 <term> utterances </term>	#17185 Each reference model is transformed to the space of the target speaker and combined byaveraging.
other,6-9-H90-1060,bq	40 <term> utterances </term> from the <term>	target speaker	</term> for <term> adaptation </term> , the <term>	#17193 Using only 40 utterances from thetarget speaker for adaptation, the error rate dropped to 4.1% --- a 45% reduction in error compared to the SI result.
lr,16-6-H90-1060,bq	adaptation ( SA ) </term> using the new <term>	SI corpus	</term> and a small amount of <term> speech	#17135 Second, we show a significant improvement for speaker adaptation (SA) using the newSI corpus and a small amount of speech from the new (target) speaker.
measure(ment),1-5-H90-1060,bq	Resource Management corpus </term> . This <term>	performance	</term> is comparable to our best condition	#17102 Thisperformance is comparable to our best condition for this test suite, using 109 training speakers.
tech,14-2-H90-1060,bq	speaker-independent ( SI ) training </term> of <term>	hidden Markov models ( HMM )	</term> , which uses a large amount of <term>	#17002 First, we present a new paradigm for speaker-independent (SI) training ofhidden Markov models ( HMM ), which uses a large amount of speech from a few speakers instead of the traditional practice of using a little speech from many speakers.
other,7-1-H90-1060,bq	paper reports on two contributions to <term>	large vocabulary continuous speech recognition	</term> . First , we present a new paradigm	#16982 This paper reports on two contributions tolarge vocabulary continuous speech recognition.
lr,23-6-H90-1060,bq	corpus </term> and a small amount of <term>	speech	</term> from the new ( target ) <term> speaker	#17142 Second, we show a significant improvement for speaker adaptation (SA) using the new SI corpus and a small amount ofspeech from the new (target) speaker.
tech,1-7-H90-1060,bq	( target ) <term> speaker </term> . A <term>	probabilistic spectral mapping	</term> is estimated independently for each	#17152 Aprobabilistic spectral mapping is estimated independently for each training (reference) speaker and the target speaker.
lr-prod,26-4-H90-1060,bq	</term> and <term> test set </term> from the <term>	DARPA Resource Management corpus	</term> . This <term> performance </term> is	#17096 With only 12 training speakers for SI recognition, we achieved a 7.5% word error rate on a standard grammar and test set from theDARPA Resource Management corpus.
other,3-9-H90-1060,bq	<term> averaging </term> . Using only 40 <term>	utterances	</term> from the <term> target speaker </term>	#17190 Using only 40utterances from the target speaker for adaptation, the error rate dropped to 4.1% --- a 45% reduction in error compared to the SI result.
other,13-3-H90-1060,bq	speakers </term> is done by averaging the <term>	statistics >	</term> of <term> independently trained models	#17047 In addition, combination of the training speakers is done by averaging thestatistics > of independently trained models rather than the usual pooling of all the speech data from many speakers prior to training.


	in Help