| lr,11-14-H89-1036,ak | Along with the development of an <term> Earley-type parser </term> for <term> TAGs </term> , <term> lexicons </term> for <term> English </term> are under development . | #19773 Along with the development of an Earley-type parser for TAGs,lexicons for English are under development. | |
| other,4-17-H89-1036,ak | We finally show how <term> idioms </term> are represented in <term> lexicalized TAGs </term> . | #19805 We finally show howidioms are represented in lexicalized TAGs. | |
| model,6-6-H89-1036,ak | There are , of course , <term> ' rules ' </term> which tell us how these structures are composed . | #19628 There are, of course,' rules ' which tell us how these structures are composed. | |
| other,12-18-H89-1036,ak | We assign them regular <term> syntactic structures </term> while representing them semantically as one <term> entry </term> . | #19824 We assign them regular syntactic structures while representing them semantically as oneentry. | |
| other,3-13-H89-1036,ak | The <term> system </term> parses <term> unification formalisms </term> that have a <term> CFG skeleton </term> and that have a <term> TAG skeleton </term> . | #19748 The system parsesunification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| other,9-8-H89-1036,ak | A <term> ' lexicalized ' grammar </term> naturally follows from the <term> extended domain of locality </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . | #19663 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from theextended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| other,13-14-H89-1036,ak | Along with the development of an <term> Earley-type parser </term> for <term> TAGs </term> , <term> lexicons </term> for <term> English </term> are under development . | #19775 Along with the development of an Earley-type parser for TAGs, lexicons forEnglish are under development. | |
| tech,1-11-H89-1036,ak | An <term> Earley-type parser </term> for <term> TAGs </term> has been has been developed . | #19721 AnEarley-type parser for TAGs has been has been developed. | |
| other,3-2-H89-1036,ak | These structures specify <term> extended domains of locality </term> ( as compared to a <term> context-free grammar </term> ) over which <term> constraints </term> can be stated . | #19545 These structures specifyextended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| other,6-3-H89-1036,ak | These <term> constraints </term> either hold within the <term> elementary structure </term> itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a given <term> elementary structure </term> . | #19570 These constraints either hold within theelementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a given elementary structure. | |
| other,8-17-H89-1036,ak | We finally show how <term> idioms </term> are represented in <term> lexicalized TAGs </term> . | #19809 We finally show how idioms are represented inlexicalized TAGs. | |
| tech,10-19-H89-1036,ak | We finally show how they can be parsed by a <term> parsing strategy </term> as mentioned above . | #19836 We finally show how they can be parsed by aparsing strategy as mentioned above. | |
| other,16-10-H89-1036,ak | In the first stage , the <term> parser </term> selects a set of <term> elementary structures </term> associated with the <term> lexical items </term> in the <term> input sentence </term> , and in the second stage the <term> sentence </term> is parsed with respect to this set . | #19698 In the first stage, the parser selects a set of elementary structures associated with thelexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| lr,1-7-H89-1036,ak | A <term> grammar </term> of this form will be said to be ' lexicalized ' . | #19641 Agrammar of this form will be said to be 'lexicalized'. | |
| lr,1-15-H89-1036,ak | A <term> lexicons </term> for <term> French </term> is also being developed . | #19781 Alexicons for French is also being developed. | |
| tech,2-9-H89-1036,ak | A general <term> parsing strategy </term> for <term> ' lexicalized ' grammars </term> is discussed . | #19672 A generalparsing strategy for 'lexicalized' grammars is discussed. | |
| other,3-15-H89-1036,ak | A <term> lexicons </term> for <term> French </term> is also being developed . | #19783 A lexicons forFrench is also being developed. | |
| other,14-13-H89-1036,ak | The <term> system </term> parses <term> unification formalisms </term> that have a <term> CFG skeleton </term> and that have a <term> TAG skeleton </term> . | #19759 The system parses unification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have aTAG skeleton. | |
| other,8-13-H89-1036,ak | The <term> system </term> parses <term> unification formalisms </term> that have a <term> CFG skeleton </term> and that have a <term> TAG skeleton </term> . | #19753 The system parses unification formalisms that have aCFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| tech,14-8-H89-1036,ak | A <term> ' lexicalized ' grammar </term> naturally follows from the <term> extended domain of locality </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . | #19668 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from the extended domain of locality ofTAGs. |
