| other,20-10-H89-1036,ak | the <term> lexical items </term> in the <term> | input sentence | </term> , and in the second stage the <term> | #19702 In the first stage, the parser selects a set of elementary structures associated with the lexical items in theinput sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| other,20-3-H89-1036,ak | structures can be composed with a given <term> | elementary structure | </term> . The <term> ' grammar ' </term> consists | #19584 These constraints either hold within the elementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a givenelementary structure. | |
| other,26-4-H89-1036,ak | structures for which that item is the <term> | head | </term> . There are no separate <term> grammar | #19613 The 'grammar' consists of a lexicon where each lexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is thehead. | |
| other,29-10-H89-1036,ak | </term> , and in the second stage the <term> | sentence | </term> is parsed with respect to this set | #19711 In the first stage, the parser selects a set of elementary structures associated with the lexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage thesentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| other,3-13-H89-1036,ak | </term> . The <term> system </term> parses <term> | unification formalisms | </term> that have a <term> CFG skeleton </term> | #19748 The system parsesunification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| other,3-15-H89-1036,ak | development . A <term> lexicons </term> for <term> | French | </term> is also being developed . Subsets | #19783 A lexicons forFrench is also being developed. | |
| other,3-2-H89-1036,ak | head </term> . These structures specify <term> | extended domains of locality | </term> ( as compared to a <term> context-free | #19545 These structures specifyextended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| other,4-11-H89-1036,ak | <term> Earley-type parser </term> for <term> | TAGs | </term> has been has been developed . It | #19724 An Earley-type parser forTAGs has been has been developed. | |
| other,4-17-H89-1036,ak | parser </term> . We finally show how <term> | idioms | </term> are represented in <term> lexicalized | #19805 We finally show howidioms are represented in lexicalized TAGs. | |
| other,4-18-H89-1036,ak | TAGs </term> . We assign them regular <term> | syntactic structures | </term> while representing them semantically | #19816 We assign them regularsyntactic structures while representing them semantically as one entry. | |
| other,5-1-H89-1036,ak | performance . In our approach , each <term> | elementary structure | </term> is systematically associated with | #19532 In our approach, eachelementary structure is systematically associated with a lexical head. | |
| other,6-3-H89-1036,ak | constraints </term> either hold within the <term> | elementary structure | </term> itself or specify what other structures | #19570 These constraints either hold within theelementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a given elementary structure. | |
| other,8-13-H89-1036,ak | unification formalisms </term> that have a <term> | CFG skeleton | </term> and that have a <term> TAG skeleton | #19753 The system parses unification formalisms that have aCFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| other,8-17-H89-1036,ak | <term> idioms </term> are represented in <term> | lexicalized TAGs | </term> . We assign them regular <term> syntactic | #19809 We finally show how idioms are represented inlexicalized TAGs. | |
| other,9-14-H89-1036,ak | <term> Earley-type parser </term> for <term> | TAGs | </term> , <term> lexicons </term> for <term> English | #19771 Along with the development of an Earley-type parser forTAGs, lexicons for English are under development. | |
| other,9-8-H89-1036,ak | grammar </term> naturally follows from the <term> | extended domain of locality | </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . A general <term> | #19663 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from theextended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| tech,1-11-H89-1036,ak | parsed with respect to this set . An <term> | Earley-type parser | </term> for <term> TAGs </term> has been has | #19721 AnEarley-type parser for TAGs has been has been developed. | |
| tech,1-13-H89-1036,ak | steps parsing strategy </term> . The <term> | system | </term> parses <term> unification formalisms | #19746 Thesystem parses unification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| tech,10-16-H89-1036,ak | being incrementally interfaced to the <term> | parser | </term> . We finally show how <term> idioms | #19799 Subsets of these lexicons are being incrementally interfaced to theparser. | |
| tech,10-19-H89-1036,ak | finally show how they can be parsed by a <term> | parsing strategy | </term> as mentioned above . This paper proposes | #19836 We finally show how they can be parsed by aparsing strategy as mentioned above. |
