| tech,2-9-H89-1036,ak | </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . A general <term> | parsing strategy | </term> for <term> ' lexicalized ' grammars | #19672 A generalparsing strategy for 'lexicalized' grammars is discussed. | |
| other,20-3-H89-1036,ak | structures can be composed with a given <term> | elementary structure | </term> . The <term> ' grammar ' </term> consists | #19584 These constraints either hold within the elementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a givenelementary structure. | |
| other,4-17-H89-1036,ak | parser </term> . We finally show how <term> | idioms | </term> are represented in <term> lexicalized | #19805 We finally show howidioms are represented in lexicalized TAGs. | |
| other,8-17-H89-1036,ak | <term> idioms </term> are represented in <term> | lexicalized TAGs | </term> . We assign them regular <term> syntactic | #19809 We finally show how idioms are represented inlexicalized TAGs. | |
| tech,14-8-H89-1036,ak | extended domain of locality </term> of <term> | TAGs | </term> . A general <term> parsing strategy | #19668 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from the extended domain of locality ofTAGs. | |
| other,11-10-H89-1036,ak | <term> parser </term> selects a set of <term> | elementary structures | </term> associated with the <term> lexical | #19693 In the first stage, the parser selects a set ofelementary structures associated with the lexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| other,12-18-H89-1036,ak | representing them semantically as one <term> | entry | </term> . We finally show how they can be | #19824 We assign them regular syntactic structures while representing them semantically as oneentry. | |
| other,3-13-H89-1036,ak | </term> . The <term> system </term> parses <term> | unification formalisms | </term> that have a <term> CFG skeleton </term> | #19748 The system parsesunification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| other,4-18-H89-1036,ak | TAGs </term> . We assign them regular <term> | syntactic structures | </term> while representing them semantically | #19816 We assign them regularsyntactic structures while representing them semantically as one entry. | |
| model,4-5-H89-1036,ak | head </term> . There are no separate <term> | grammar rules | </term> . There are , of course , <term> ' | #19619 There are no separategrammar rules. | |
| other,3-2-H89-1036,ak | head </term> . These structures specify <term> | extended domains of locality | </term> ( as compared to a <term> context-free | #19545 These structures specifyextended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| tech,6-10-H89-1036,ak | discussed . In the first stage , the <term> | parser | </term> selects a set of <term> elementary | #19688 In the first stage, theparser selects a set of elementary structures associated with the lexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| tech,1-13-H89-1036,ak | steps parsing strategy </term> . The <term> | system | </term> parses <term> unification formalisms | #19746 Thesystem parses unification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| lr,1-4-H89-1036,ak | <term> elementary structure </term> . The <term> | ' grammar ' | </term> consists of a <term> lexicon </term> | #19588 The' grammar ' consists of a lexicon where each lexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is the head. | |
| other,9-8-H89-1036,ak | grammar </term> naturally follows from the <term> | extended domain of locality | </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . A general <term> | #19663 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from theextended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| other,20-10-H89-1036,ak | the <term> lexical items </term> in the <term> | input sentence | </term> , and in the second stage the <term> | #19702 In the first stage, the parser selects a set of elementary structures associated with the lexical items in theinput sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| other,26-4-H89-1036,ak | structures for which that item is the <term> | head | </term> . There are no separate <term> grammar | #19613 The 'grammar' consists of a lexicon where each lexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is thehead. | |
| tech,9-12-H89-1036,ak | be adapted to take advantage of the <term> | two steps parsing strategy | </term> . The <term> system </term> parses <term> | #19740 It can be adapted to take advantage of thetwo steps parsing strategy. | |
| other,29-10-H89-1036,ak | </term> , and in the second stage the <term> | sentence | </term> is parsed with respect to this set | #19711 In the first stage, the parser selects a set of elementary structures associated with the lexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage thesentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| tech,10-16-H89-1036,ak | being incrementally interfaced to the <term> | parser | </term> . We finally show how <term> idioms | #19799 Subsets of these lexicons are being incrementally interfaced to theparser. |
