| other,10-4-H89-1036,ak | of a <term> lexicon </term> where each <term> | lexical item | </term> is associated with a finite number | #19597 The 'grammar' consists of a lexicon where eachlexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is the head. | |
| other,14-13-H89-1036,ak | CFG skeleton </term> and that have a <term> | TAG skeleton | </term> . Along with the development of an | #19759 The system parses unification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have aTAG skeleton. | |
| tech,9-12-H89-1036,ak | be adapted to take advantage of the <term> | two steps parsing strategy | </term> . The <term> system </term> parses <term> | #19740 It can be adapted to take advantage of thetwo steps parsing strategy. | |
| lr,5-9-H89-1036,ak | general <term> parsing strategy </term> for <term> | ' lexicalized ' grammars | </term> is discussed . In the first stage | #19675 A general parsing strategy for' lexicalized ' grammars is discussed. | |
| lr,1-7-H89-1036,ak | these structures are composed . A <term> | grammar | </term> of this form will be said to be ' | #19641 Agrammar of this form will be said to be 'lexicalized'. | |
| tech,1-11-H89-1036,ak | parsed with respect to this set . An <term> | Earley-type parser | </term> for <term> TAGs </term> has been has | #19721 AnEarley-type parser for TAGs has been has been developed. | |
| other,11-10-H89-1036,ak | <term> parser </term> selects a set of <term> | elementary structures | </term> associated with the <term> lexical | #19693 In the first stage, the parser selects a set ofelementary structures associated with the lexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| other,13-14-H89-1036,ak | TAGs </term> , <term> lexicons </term> for <term> | English | </term> are under development . A <term> lexicons | #19775 Along with the development of an Earley-type parser for TAGs, lexicons forEnglish are under development. | |
| tech,10-16-H89-1036,ak | being incrementally interfaced to the <term> | parser | </term> . We finally show how <term> idioms | #19799 Subsets of these lexicons are being incrementally interfaced to theparser. | |
| tech,6-10-H89-1036,ak | discussed . In the first stage , the <term> | parser | </term> selects a set of <term> elementary | #19688 In the first stage, theparser selects a set of elementary structures associated with the lexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| other,3-13-H89-1036,ak | </term> . The <term> system </term> parses <term> | unification formalisms | </term> that have a <term> CFG skeleton </term> | #19748 The system parsesunification formalisms that have a CFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| other,12-1-H89-1036,ak | is systematically associated with a <term> | lexical head | </term> . These structures specify <term> extended | #19539 In our approach, each elementary structure is systematically associated with alexical head. | |
| tech,10-19-H89-1036,ak | finally show how they can be parsed by a <term> | parsing strategy | </term> as mentioned above . This paper proposes | #19836 We finally show how they can be parsed by aparsing strategy as mentioned above. | |
| other,12-18-H89-1036,ak | representing them semantically as one <term> | entry | </term> . We finally show how they can be | #19824 We assign them regular syntactic structures while representing them semantically as oneentry. | |
| other,12-2-H89-1036,ak | locality </term> ( as compared to a <term> | context-free grammar | </term> ) over which <term> constraints </term> | #19554 These structures specify extended domains of locality (as compared to acontext-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| other,9-8-H89-1036,ak | grammar </term> naturally follows from the <term> | extended domain of locality | </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . A general <term> | #19663 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from theextended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| other,5-1-H89-1036,ak | performance . In our approach , each <term> | elementary structure | </term> is systematically associated with | #19532 In our approach, eachelementary structure is systematically associated with a lexical head. | |
| other,3-2-H89-1036,ak | head </term> . These structures specify <term> | extended domains of locality | </term> ( as compared to a <term> context-free | #19545 These structures specifyextended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| other,4-11-H89-1036,ak | <term> Earley-type parser </term> for <term> | TAGs | </term> has been has been developed . It | #19724 An Earley-type parser forTAGs has been has been developed. | |
| other,8-17-H89-1036,ak | <term> idioms </term> are represented in <term> | lexicalized TAGs | </term> . We assign them regular <term> syntactic | #19809 We finally show how idioms are represented inlexicalized TAGs. |
