| tech,24-1-E93-1004,ak | an extension LT ( LF ) for imposing <term> | constraints | </term> on <term> trees </term> decorated with | #24671 In this paper we introduce a modal language LT for imposing constraints on trees, and an extension LT (LF) for imposingconstraints on trees decorated with feature structures. | |
| tech,5-2-E93-1004,ak | The motivation for introducing these <term> | languages | </term> is to provide tools for formalising | #24684 The motivation for introducing theselanguages is to provide tools for formalising grammatical frameworks perspicuously, and the paper illustrates this by showing how the leading ideas of GPSG can be captured in LT (LF). | |
| tech,29-1-E93-1004,ak | on <term> trees </term> decorated with <term> | feature structures | </term> . The motivation for introducing | #24676 In this paper we introduce a modal language LT for imposing constraints on trees, and an extension LT (LF) for imposing constraints on trees decorated withfeature structures. | |
| other,13-1-E93-1004,ak | imposing <term> constraints </term> on <term> | trees | </term> , and an extension LT ( LF ) for | #24660 In this paper we introduce a modal language LT for imposing constraints ontrees, and an extension LT (LF) for imposing constraints on trees decorated with feature structures. | |
| tech,6-1-E93-1004,ak | </term> . In this paper we introduce a <term> | modal language LT | </term> for imposing <term> constraints </term> | #24653 In this paper we introduce amodal language LT for imposing constraints on trees, and an extension LT (LF) for imposing constraints on trees decorated with feature structures. | |
| tech,11-1-E93-1004,ak | modal language LT </term> for imposing <term> | constraints | </term> on <term> trees </term> , and an extension | #24658 In this paper we introduce a modal language LT for imposingconstraints on trees, and an extension LT (LF) for imposing constraints on trees decorated with feature structures. | |
| tech,17-3-E93-1004,ak | in particular , what we have called <term> | layered modal languages | </term> ) as <term> constraint formalisms </term> | #24734 In addition, the role of modal languages (and in particular, what we have calledlayered modal languages) as constraint formalisms for linguistic theorising is discussed in some detail. | |
| other,22-3-E93-1004,ak | layered modal languages </term> ) as <term> | constraint formalisms | </term> for linguistic theorising is discussed | #24739 In addition, the role of modal languages (and in particular, what we have called layered modal languages) asconstraint formalisms for linguistic theorising is discussed in some detail. | |
| other,28-2-E93-1004,ak | by showing how the leading ideas of <term> | GPSG | </term> can be captured in LT ( LF ) . In | #24707 The motivation for introducing these languages is to provide tools for formalising grammatical frameworks perspicuously, and the paper illustrates this by showing how the leading ideas ofGPSG can be captured in LT (LF). | |
| other,26-1-E93-1004,ak | imposing <term> constraints </term> on <term> | trees | </term> decorated with <term> feature structures | #24673 In this paper we introduce a modal language LT for imposing constraints on trees, and an extension LT (LF) for imposing constraints ontrees decorated with feature structures. | |
| other,12-2-E93-1004,ak | is to provide tools for formalising <term> | grammatical frameworks | </term> perspicuously , and the paper illustrates | #24691 The motivation for introducing these languages is to provide tools for formalisinggrammatical frameworks perspicuously, and the paper illustrates this by showing how the leading ideas of GPSG can be captured in LT (LF). | |
| tech,6-3-E93-1004,ak | ( LF ) . In addition , the role of <term> | modal languages | </term> ( and in particular , what we have | #24723 In addition, the role ofmodal languages (and in particular, what we have called layered modal languages) as constraint formalisms for linguistic theorising is discussed in some detail. |
