| other,12-1-E85-1041,ak | model formalizing the structure of <term> | communicative context | </term> in <term> dialogue interaction </term> | #15642 We propose a draft scheme of the model formalizing the structure ofcommunicative context in dialogue interaction. | |
| other,15-1-E85-1041,ak | <term> communicative context </term> in <term> | dialogue interaction | </term> . The relationships between the interacting | #15645 We propose a draft scheme of the model formalizing the structure of communicative context indialogue interaction. | |
| tech,12-2-E85-1041,ak | are considered as system of three <term> | automata | </term> representing the partners of the <term> | #15660 The relationships between the interacting partners are considered as system of threeautomata representing the partners of the dialogue and environment. | |
| other,18-2-E85-1041,ak | </term> representing the partners of the <term> | dialogue | </term> and <term> environment </term> . The <term> | #15666 The relationships between the interacting partners are considered as system of three automata representing the partners of thedialogue and environment. | |
| other,20-2-E85-1041,ak | partners of the <term> dialogue </term> and <term> | environment | </term> . The <term> communicative competence | #15668 The relationships between the interacting partners are considered as system of three automata representing the partners of the dialogue andenvironment. | |
| other,1-3-E85-1041,ak | </term> and <term> environment </term> . The <term> | communicative competence | </term> of the partners is defined by - the | #15671 Thecommunicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possible states of the three automata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to given contract. | |
| other,15-3-E85-1041,ak | partners is defined by - the set M of all <term> | propositions | </term> reflecting the possible <term> states | #15685 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of allpropositions reflecting the possible states of the three automata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to given contract. | |
| other,19-3-E85-1041,ak | propositions </term> reflecting the possible <term> | states | </term> of the three <term> automata </term> | #15689 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possiblestates of the three automata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to given contract. | |
| tech,23-3-E85-1041,ak | possible <term> states </term> of the three <term> | automata | </term> within the model ; - the set K of | #15693 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possible states of the threeautomata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to given contract. | |
| other,33-3-E85-1041,ak | </term> within the model ; - the set K of <term> | contracts | </term> representing all kinds of <term> human-to-human | #15703 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possible states of the three automata within the model; - the set K ofcontracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to given contract. | |
| other,38-3-E85-1041,ak | contracts </term> representing all kinds of <term> | human-to-human relationships | </term> ( social , interpersonal , professional | #15708 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possible states of the three automata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds ofhuman-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to given contract. | |
| other,54-3-E85-1041,ak | which include fixation of particular <term> | roles | </term> for the partners ; - the set T of | #15724 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possible states of the three automata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particularroles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to given contract. | |
| other,65-3-E85-1041,ak | partners ; - the set T of possible <term> | topics | </term> related to given <term> contract </term> | #15735 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possible states of the three automata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possibletopics related to given contract. | |
| other,69-3-E85-1041,ak | <term> topics </term> related to given <term> | contract | </term> . The authors believe the system | #15739 The communicative competence of the partners is defined by - the set M of all propositions reflecting the possible states of the three automata within the model; - the set K of contracts representing all kinds of human-to-human relationships (social, interpersonal, professional, etc.) which include fixation of particular roles for the partners; - the set T of possible topics related to givencontract. | |
| tech,22-4-E85-1041,ak | the communicative component in the <term> | dialogue system | </term> . By generalizing the notion of location | #15763 The authors believe the system of the notions presented may be used as a basis for forming the communicative component in thedialogue system. |
