Concordance

Query C90-3046 7 (224.1 per million)

tech,4-1-C90-3046,ak	This paper proposes that <term> sentence analysis </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> argumentation system </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> .	#20621 This paper proposes thatsentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
tech,10-1-C90-3046,ak	This paper proposes that <term> sentence analysis </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> argumentation system </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> .	#20627 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated asdefeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
tech,24-1-C90-3046,ak	This paper proposes that <term> sentence analysis </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> argumentation system </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> .	#20641 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using anargumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
tech,34-1-C90-3046,ak	This paper proposes that <term> sentence analysis </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> argumentation system </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> .	#20651 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization ofdefeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
other,39-1-C90-3046,ak	This paper proposes that <term> sentence analysis </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> argumentation system </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> .	#20656 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includesarguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
model,41-1-C90-3046,ak	This paper proposes that <term> sentence analysis </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> argumentation system </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> .	#20658 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments anddefeat rules that capture defeasibility.
other,45-1-C90-3046,ak	This paper proposes that <term> sentence analysis </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> argumentation system </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> .	#20662 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capturedefeasibility.


	in Help