Concordance

Query C90-3045 18 >
Random sample 18 >
Subparts filter 18 >
Negative filter formalism, 's 17 (544.3 per million)

other,4-1-C90-3045,ak	The unique properties of <term> tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) </term> present a challenge for the application of <term> TAGs </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> syntax </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> automatic translation </term> of <term> natural language </term> .	#20489 The unique properties oftree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language.
other,16-1-C90-3045,ak	The unique properties of <term> tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) </term> present a challenge for the application of <term> TAGs </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> syntax </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> automatic translation </term> of <term> natural language </term> .	#20501 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application ofTAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language.
other,22-1-C90-3045,ak	The unique properties of <term> tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) </term> present a challenge for the application of <term> TAGs </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> syntax </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> automatic translation </term> of <term> natural language </term> .	#20507 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines ofsyntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language.
tech,31-1-C90-3045,ak	The unique properties of <term> tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) </term> present a challenge for the application of <term> TAGs </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> syntax </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> automatic translation </term> of <term> natural language </term> .	#20516 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task ofsemantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language.
tech,34-1-C90-3045,ak	The unique properties of <term> tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) </term> present a challenge for the application of <term> TAGs </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> syntax </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> automatic translation </term> of <term> natural language </term> .	#20519 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation orautomatic translation of natural language.
other,37-1-C90-3045,ak	The unique properties of <term> tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) </term> present a challenge for the application of <term> TAGs </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> syntax </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> automatic translation </term> of <term> natural language </term> .	#20522 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation ofnatural language.
other,5-2-C90-3045,ak	We present a variant of <term> TAGs </term> , called <term> synchronous TAGs </term> , which characterize correspondences between <term> languages </term> .	#20530 We present a variant ofTAGs, called synchronous TAGs, which characterize correspondences between languages.
other,8-2-C90-3045,ak	We present a variant of <term> TAGs </term> , called <term> synchronous TAGs </term> , which characterize correspondences between <term> languages </term> .	#20533 We present a variant of TAGs, calledsynchronous TAGs, which characterize correspondences between languages.
other,15-2-C90-3045,ak	We present a variant of <term> TAGs </term> , called <term> synchronous TAGs </term> , which characterize correspondences between <term> languages </term> .	#20540 We present a variant of TAGs, called synchronous TAGs, which characterize correspondences betweenlanguages.
other,8-3-C90-3045,ak	The <term> formalism 's </term> intended usage is to relate <term> expressions </term> of <term> natural languages </term> to their associated <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> logical form language </term> , or to their translates in another <term> natural language </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow <term> TAGs </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> syntax </term> proper .	#20550 The formalism's intended usage is to relateexpressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper.
other,10-3-C90-3045,ak	The <term> formalism 's </term> intended usage is to relate <term> expressions </term> of <term> natural languages </term> to their associated <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> logical form language </term> , or to their translates in another <term> natural language </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow <term> TAGs </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> syntax </term> proper .	#20552 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions ofnatural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper.
other,15-3-C90-3045,ak	The <term> formalism 's </term> intended usage is to relate <term> expressions </term> of <term> natural languages </term> to their associated <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> logical form language </term> , or to their translates in another <term> natural language </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow <term> TAGs </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> syntax </term> proper .	#20557 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associatedsemantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper.
other,19-3-C90-3045,ak	The <term> formalism 's </term> intended usage is to relate <term> expressions </term> of <term> natural languages </term> to their associated <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> logical form language </term> , or to their translates in another <term> natural language </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow <term> TAGs </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> syntax </term> proper .	#20561 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in alogical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper.
other,29-3-C90-3045,ak	The <term> formalism 's </term> intended usage is to relate <term> expressions </term> of <term> natural languages </term> to their associated <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> logical form language </term> , or to their translates in another <term> natural language </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow <term> TAGs </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> syntax </term> proper .	#20571 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in anothernatural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper.
other,40-3-C90-3045,ak	The <term> formalism 's </term> intended usage is to relate <term> expressions </term> of <term> natural languages </term> to their associated <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> logical form language </term> , or to their translates in another <term> natural language </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow <term> TAGs </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> syntax </term> proper .	#20582 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allowTAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper.
other,48-3-C90-3045,ak	The <term> formalism 's </term> intended usage is to relate <term> expressions </term> of <term> natural languages </term> to their associated <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> logical form language </term> , or to their translates in another <term> natural language </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow <term> TAGs </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> syntax </term> proper .	#20590 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role insyntax proper.
other,5-4-C90-3045,ak	We discuss the application of <term> synchronous TAGs </term> to concrete examples , mentioning primarily in passing some computational issues that arise in its interpretation .	#20598 We discuss the application ofsynchronous TAGs to concrete examples, mentioning primarily in passing some computational issues that arise in its interpretation.


	in Help