| other,4-1-C90-3045,ak | approach </term> . The unique properties of <term> | tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) | </term> present a challenge for the application | #20489 The unique properties oftree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language. | |
| other,22-1-C90-3045,ak | </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> | syntax | </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> | #20507 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines ofsyntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language. | |
| tech,31-1-C90-3045,ak | </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> | semantic interpretation | </term> or <term> automatic translation </term> | #20516 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task ofsemantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language. | |
| tech,34-1-C90-3045,ak | <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> | automatic translation | </term> of <term> natural language </term> . | #20519 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation orautomatic translation of natural language. | |
| other,37-1-C90-3045,ak | <term> automatic translation </term> of <term> | natural language | </term> . We present a variant of <term> TAGs | #20522 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation ofnatural language. | |
| other,1-3-C90-3045,ak | between <term> languages </term> . The <term> | formalism 's | </term> intended usage is to relate <term> | #20543 Theformalism 's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. | |
| other,19-3-C90-3045,ak | <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> | logical form language | </term> , or to their translates in another | #20561 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in alogical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. | |
| other,29-3-C90-3045,ak | or to their translates in another <term> | natural language | </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow | #20571 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in anothernatural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. | |
| other,48-3-C90-3045,ak | </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> | syntax | </term> proper . We discuss the application | #20590 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role insyntax proper. |
