Concordance

Query C04-1128 18 (839.2 per million)

tech,1-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6203 Whilesentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
tech,7-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6209 While sentence extraction as an approach tosummarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
other,14-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6216 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work indocuments of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
other,17-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6219 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certaingenres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
other,25-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6227 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature ofemail communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
other,28-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6230 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication whereutterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
tech,38-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6240 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously,sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
other,45-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6247 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessarysegments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent.
other,47-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6249 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments ofdialogue that would make a summary coherent.
other,52-1-C04-1128,bq	While <term> sentence extraction </term> as an approach to <term> summarization </term> has been shown to work in <term> documents </term> of certain <term> genres </term> , because of the conversational nature of <term> email communication </term> where <term> utterances </term> are made in relation to one made previously , <term> sentence extraction </term> may not capture the necessary <term> segments </term> of <term> dialogue </term> that would make a <term> summary </term> coherent .	#6254 While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make asummary coherent.
other,12-2-C04-1128,bq	In this paper , we present our work on the detection of <term> question-answer pairs </term> in an <term> email conversation </term> for the task of <term> email summarization </term> .	#6269 In this paper, we present our work on the detection ofquestion-answer pairs in an email conversation for the task of email summarization.
other,16-2-C04-1128,bq	In this paper , we present our work on the detection of <term> question-answer pairs </term> in an <term> email conversation </term> for the task of <term> email summarization </term> .	#6273 In this paper, we present our work on the detection of question-answer pairs in anemail conversation for the task of email summarization.
tech,22-2-C04-1128,bq	In this paper , we present our work on the detection of <term> question-answer pairs </term> in an <term> email conversation </term> for the task of <term> email summarization </term> .	#6279 In this paper, we present our work on the detection of question-answer pairs in an email conversation for the task ofemail summarization.
other,4-3-C04-1128,bq	We show that various <term> features </term> based on the structure of <term> email-threads </term> can be used to improve upon <term> lexical similarity </term> of <term> discourse segments </term> for <term> question-answer pairing </term> .	#6286 We show that variousfeatures based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity of discourse segments for question-answer pairing.
other,10-3-C04-1128,bq	We show that various <term> features </term> based on the structure of <term> email-threads </term> can be used to improve upon <term> lexical similarity </term> of <term> discourse segments </term> for <term> question-answer pairing </term> .	#6292 We show that various features based on the structure ofemail-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity of discourse segments for question-answer pairing.
other,17-3-C04-1128,bq	We show that various <term> features </term> based on the structure of <term> email-threads </term> can be used to improve upon <term> lexical similarity </term> of <term> discourse segments </term> for <term> question-answer pairing </term> .	#6299 We show that various features based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve uponlexical similarity of discourse segments for question-answer pairing.
other,20-3-C04-1128,bq	We show that various <term> features </term> based on the structure of <term> email-threads </term> can be used to improve upon <term> lexical similarity </term> of <term> discourse segments </term> for <term> question-answer pairing </term> .	#6302 We show that various features based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity ofdiscourse segments for question-answer pairing.
tech,23-3-C04-1128,bq	We show that various <term> features </term> based on the structure of <term> email-threads </term> can be used to improve upon <term> lexical similarity </term> of <term> discourse segments </term> for <term> question-answer pairing </term> .	#6305 We show that various features based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity of discourse segments forquestion-answer pairing.


	in Help