tech,1-1-C04-1128,bq |
our approach is successful . While
<term>
|
sentence extraction
|
</term>
as an approach to
<term>
summarization
|
#6203
Whilesentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
tech,7-1-C04-1128,bq |
extraction
</term>
as an approach to
<term>
|
summarization
|
</term>
has been shown to work in
<term>
documents
|
#6209
While sentence extraction as an approach tosummarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
other,14-1-C04-1128,bq |
summarization
</term>
has been shown to work in
<term>
|
documents
|
</term>
of certain
<term>
genres
</term>
, because
|
#6216
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work indocuments of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
other,17-1-C04-1128,bq |
in
<term>
documents
</term>
of certain
<term>
|
genres
|
</term>
, because of the conversational nature
|
#6219
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certaingenres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
other,25-1-C04-1128,bq |
because of the conversational nature of
<term>
|
email communication
|
</term>
where
<term>
utterances
</term>
are made
|
#6227
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature ofemail communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
other,28-1-C04-1128,bq |
<term>
email communication
</term>
where
<term>
|
utterances
|
</term>
are made in relation to one made
|
#6230
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication whereutterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
tech,38-1-C04-1128,bq |
relation to one made previously ,
<term>
|
sentence extraction
|
</term>
may not capture the necessary
<term>
|
#6240
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously,sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
other,45-1-C04-1128,bq |
</term>
may not capture the necessary
<term>
|
segments
|
</term>
of
<term>
dialogue
</term>
that would
|
#6247
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessarysegments of dialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
other,47-1-C04-1128,bq |
the necessary
<term>
segments
</term>
of
<term>
|
dialogue
|
</term>
that would make a
<term>
summary
</term>
|
#6249
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments ofdialogue that would make a summary coherent. |
other,52-1-C04-1128,bq |
<term>
dialogue
</term>
that would make a
<term>
|
summary
|
</term>
coherent . In this paper , we present
|
#6254
While sentence extraction as an approach to summarization has been shown to work in documents of certain genres, because of the conversational nature of email communication where utterances are made in relation to one made previously, sentence extraction may not capture the necessary segments of dialogue that would make asummary coherent. |
other,12-2-C04-1128,bq |
present our work on the detection of
<term>
|
question-answer pairs
|
</term>
in an
<term>
email conversation
</term>
|
#6269
In this paper, we present our work on the detection ofquestion-answer pairs in an email conversation for the task of email summarization. |
other,16-2-C04-1128,bq |
<term>
question-answer pairs
</term>
in an
<term>
|
email conversation
|
</term>
for the task of
<term>
email summarization
|
#6273
In this paper, we present our work on the detection of question-answer pairs in anemail conversation for the task of email summarization. |
tech,22-2-C04-1128,bq |
conversation
</term>
for the task of
<term>
|
email summarization
|
</term>
. We show that various
<term>
features
|
#6279
In this paper, we present our work on the detection of question-answer pairs in an email conversation for the task ofemail summarization. |
other,4-3-C04-1128,bq |
summarization
</term>
. We show that various
<term>
|
features
|
</term>
based on the structure of
<term>
email-threads
|
#6286
We show that variousfeatures based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity of discourse segments for question-answer pairing. |
other,10-3-C04-1128,bq |
features
</term>
based on the structure of
<term>
|
email-threads
|
</term>
can be used to improve upon
<term>
|
#6292
We show that various features based on the structure ofemail-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity of discourse segments for question-answer pairing. |
other,17-3-C04-1128,bq |
</term>
can be used to improve upon
<term>
|
lexical similarity
|
</term>
of
<term>
discourse segments
</term>
|
#6299
We show that various features based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve uponlexical similarity of discourse segments for question-answer pairing. |
other,20-3-C04-1128,bq |
upon
<term>
lexical similarity
</term>
of
<term>
|
discourse segments
|
</term>
for
<term>
question-answer pairing
</term>
|
#6302
We show that various features based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity ofdiscourse segments for question-answer pairing. |
tech,23-3-C04-1128,bq |
<term>
discourse segments
</term>
for
<term>
|
question-answer pairing
|
</term>
. We present a framework for the
|
#6305
We show that various features based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity of discourse segments forquestion-answer pairing. |