| tech,3-1-A94-1011,bq | translation </term> use . The use of <term> | NLP techniques | </term> for <term> document classification </term> | #19886 The use ofNLP techniques for document classification has not produced significant improvements in performance within the standard term weighting statistical assignment paradigm (Fagan 1987; Lewis, 1992bc; Buckley, 1993). |
| tech,6-1-A94-1011,bq | use of <term> NLP techniques </term> for <term> | document classification | </term> has not produced significant improvements | #19889 The use of NLP techniques fordocument classification has not produced significant improvements in performance within the standard term weighting statistical assignment paradigm (Fagan 1987; Lewis, 1992bc; Buckley, 1993). |
| tech,18-1-A94-1011,bq | in performance within the standard <term> | term weighting statistical assignment paradigm | </term> ( Fagan 1987 ; Lewis , 1992bc ; Buckley | #19901 The use of NLP techniques for document classification has not produced significant improvements in performance within the standardterm weighting statistical assignment paradigm (Fagan 1987; Lewis, 1992bc; Buckley, 1993). |
| tech,16-2-A94-1011,bq | if the power of recently developed <term> | NLP techniques | </term> are to be successfully applied in | #19935 This perplexing fact needs both an explanation and a solution if the power of recently developedNLP techniques are to be successfully applied in IR. |
| tech,24-2-A94-1011,bq | </term> are to be successfully applied in <term> | IR | </term> . A novel method for adding <term> | #19943 This perplexing fact needs both an explanation and a solution if the power of recently developed NLP techniques are to be successfully applied inIR. |
| other,5-3-A94-1011,bq | </term> . A novel method for adding <term> | linguistic annotation | </term> to <term> corpora </term> is presented | #19950 A novel method for addinglinguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| lr,8-3-A94-1011,bq | <term> linguistic annotation </term> to <term> | corpora | </term> is presented which involves using | #19953 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation tocorpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| tech,15-3-A94-1011,bq | is presented which involves using a <term> | statistical POS tagger | </term> in conjunction with <term> unsupervised | #19960 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using astatistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| tech,21-3-A94-1011,bq | POS tagger </term> in conjunction with <term> | unsupervised structure finding methods | </term> to derive notions of <term> noun group | #19966 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction withunsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,29-3-A94-1011,bq | methods </term> to derive notions of <term> | noun group | </term> , <term> verb group </term> , and so | #19974 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions ofnoun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,32-3-A94-1011,bq | notions of <term> noun group </term> , <term> | verb group | </term> , and so on which is inherently extensible | #19977 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group,verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,45-3-A94-1011,bq | inherently extensible to more sophisticated <term> | annotation | </term> , and does not require a <term> pre-tagged | #19990 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticatedannotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| lr,52-3-A94-1011,bq | annotation </term> , and does not require a <term> | pre-tagged corpus | </term> to fit . One of the distinguishing | #19997 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require apre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,8-4-A94-1011,bq | distinguishing features of a more <term> | linguistically sophisticated representation of documents | </term> over a <term> word set based representation | #20010 One of the distinguishing features of a morelinguistically sophisticated representation of documents over a word set based representation of them is that linguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors of document descriptors (keywords) than single words are. |
| other,15-4-A94-1011,bq | representation of documents </term> over a <term> | word set based representation | </term> of them is that <term> linguistically | #20017 One of the distinguishing features of a more linguistically sophisticated representation of documents over aword set based representation of them is that linguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors of document descriptors (keywords) than single words are. |
| other,23-4-A94-1011,bq | representation </term> of them is that <term> | linguistically sophisticated units | </term> are more frequently individually | #20025 One of the distinguishing features of a more linguistically sophisticated representation of documents over a word set based representation of them is thatlinguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors of document descriptors (keywords) than single words are. |
| other,33-4-A94-1011,bq | frequently individually good predictors of <term> | document descriptors ( keywords ) | </term> than single <term> words </term> are | #20035 One of the distinguishing features of a more linguistically sophisticated representation of documents over a word set based representation of them is that linguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors ofdocument descriptors ( keywords ) than single words are. |
| other,40-4-A94-1011,bq | descriptors ( keywords ) </term> than single <term> | words | </term> are . This leads us to consider the | #20042 One of the distinguishing features of a more linguistically sophisticated representation of documents over a word set based representation of them is that linguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors of document descriptors (keywords) than singlewords are. |
| other,8-5-A94-1011,bq | leads us to consider the assignment of <term> | descriptors | </term> from individual <term> phrases </term> | #20053 This leads us to consider the assignment ofdescriptors from individual phrases rather than from the weighted sum of a word set representation. |
| other,11-5-A94-1011,bq | <term> descriptors </term> from individual <term> | phrases | </term> rather than from the <term> weighted | #20056 This leads us to consider the assignment of descriptors from individualphrases rather than from the weighted sum of a word set representation. |
