| other,5-3-A94-1011,bq | </term> . A novel method for adding <term> | linguistic annotation | </term> to <term> corpora </term> is presented | #19950 A novel method for addinglinguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,20-5-A94-1011,bq | from the <term> weighted sum </term> of a <term> | word set representation | </term> . We investigate how sets of individually | #20065 This leads us to consider the assignment of descriptors from individual phrases rather than from the weighted sum of aword set representation. |
| tech,15-3-A94-1011,bq | is presented which involves using a <term> | statistical POS tagger | </term> in conjunction with <term> unsupervised | #19960 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using astatistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| lr,52-3-A94-1011,bq | annotation </term> , and does not require a <term> | pre-tagged corpus | </term> to fit . One of the distinguishing | #19997 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require apre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,15-4-A94-1011,bq | representation of documents </term> over a <term> | word set based representation | </term> of them is that <term> linguistically | #20017 One of the distinguishing features of a more linguistically sophisticated representation of documents over aword set based representation of them is that linguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors of document descriptors (keywords) than single words are. |
| other,16-5-A94-1011,bq | phrases </term> rather than from the <term> | weighted sum | </term> of a <term> word set representation | #20061 This leads us to consider the assignment of descriptors from individual phrases rather than from theweighted sum of a word set representation. |
| tech,26-7-A94-1011,bq | representations </term> , and show that a <term> | statistically fitted rule-based model | </term> provides significantly improved performance | #20122 We then proceed to repeat results which show that standard statistical models are not particularly suitable for exploiting linguistically sophisticated representations, and show that astatistically fitted rule-based model provides significantly improved performance for sophisticated representations. |
| lr,8-3-A94-1011,bq | <term> linguistic annotation </term> to <term> | corpora | </term> is presented which involves using | #19953 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation tocorpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,32-3-A94-1011,bq | notions of <term> noun group </term> , <term> | verb group | </term> , and so on which is inherently extensible | #19977 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions of noun group,verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| tech,6-1-A94-1011,bq | use of <term> NLP techniques </term> for <term> | document classification | </term> has not produced significant improvements | #19889 The use of NLP techniques fordocument classification has not produced significant improvements in performance within the standard term weighting statistical assignment paradigm (Fagan 1987; Lewis, 1992bc; Buckley, 1993). |
| other,8-8-A94-1011,bq | statistical systems </term> can exploit <term> | sophisticated representations of documents | </term> , and lends some support to the use | #20142 It therefore shows that statistical systems can exploitsophisticated representations of documents, and lends some support to the use of more linguistically sophisticated representations for document classification. |
| other,29-3-A94-1011,bq | methods </term> to derive notions of <term> | noun group | </term> , <term> verb group </term> , and so | #19974 A novel method for adding linguistic annotation to corpora is presented which involves using a statistical POS tagger in conjunction with unsupervised structure finding methods to derive notions ofnoun group, verb group, and so on which is inherently extensible to more sophisticated annotation, and does not require a pre-tagged corpus to fit. |
| other,8-4-A94-1011,bq | distinguishing features of a more <term> | linguistically sophisticated representation of documents | </term> over a <term> word set based representation | #20010 One of the distinguishing features of a morelinguistically sophisticated representation of documents over a word set based representation of them is that linguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors of document descriptors (keywords) than single words are. |
| tech,18-9-A94-1011,bq | check </term> , which is creating a <term> | PC based tool | </term> to be used in the <term> technical | #20181 This paper reports on work done for the LRE project SmTA double check, which is creating aPC based tool to be used in the technical abstracting industry. |
| tech,16-2-A94-1011,bq | if the power of recently developed <term> | NLP techniques | </term> are to be successfully applied in | #19935 This perplexing fact needs both an explanation and a solution if the power of recently developedNLP techniques are to be successfully applied in IR. |
| other,33-4-A94-1011,bq | frequently individually good predictors of <term> | document descriptors ( keywords ) | </term> than single <term> words </term> are | #20035 One of the distinguishing features of a more linguistically sophisticated representation of documents over a word set based representation of them is that linguistically sophisticated units are more frequently individually good predictors ofdocument descriptors ( keywords ) than single words are. |
