| other,7-1-A94-1007,ak | authors propose a model for analyzing <term> | English sentences | </term> including <term> coordinate conjunctions | #25567 The authors propose a model for analyzingEnglish sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words. | |
| other,10-1-A94-1007,ak | <term> English sentences </term> including <term> | coordinate conjunctions | </term> such as and , or , but and the equivalent | #25570 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences includingcoordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words. | |
| tech,0-2-A94-1007,ak | the equivalent <term> words </term> . <term> | Syntactic analysis | </term> of the <term> English coordinate sentences | #25584 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems. | |
| other,4-2-A94-1007,ak | <term> Syntactic analysis </term> of the <term> | English coordinate sentences | </term> is one of the most difficult problems | #25588 Syntactic analysis of theEnglish coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems. | |
| tech,15-2-A94-1007,ak | of the most difficult problems for <term> | machine translation ( MT ) systems | </term> . The problem is selecting , from | #25599 Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems formachine translation ( MT ) systems. | |
| model,12-3-A94-1007,ak | <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate | #25618 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| other,18-3-A94-1007,ak | structure </term> formed by an individual <term> | coordinate conjunction | </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents | #25624 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individualcoordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| other,29-3-A94-1007,ak | constituents </term> are coordinated by the <term> | conjunction | </term> . Typically , so many possible <term> | #25635 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by theconjunction. | |
| tech,9-4-A94-1007,ak | structures </term> are produced that <term> | MT systems | </term> can not select the correct one , | #25646 Typically, so many possible structures are produced thatMT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. | |
| model,4-5-A94-1007,ak | notations . This paper presents an <term> | English coordinate structure analysis model | </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope | #25673 This paper presents anEnglish coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,12-5-A94-1007,ak | analysis model </term> , which provides <term> | top-down scope information | </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure | #25681 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| model,18-5-A94-1007,ak | scope information </term> of the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric | #25687 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,29-5-A94-1007,ak | symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> | parallelism | </term> . The <term> model </term> is based on | #25698 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism. | |
| model,1-6-A94-1007,ak | of the <term> parallelism </term> . The <term> | model | </term> is based on a <term> balance matching | #25701 Themodel is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| tech,6-6-A94-1007,ak | The <term> model </term> is based on a <term> | balance matching operation | </term> for two lists of the <term> feature | #25706 The model is based on abalance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,14-6-A94-1007,ak | operation </term> for two lists of the <term> | feature sets | </term> , which provides four effects : the | #25714 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of thefeature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,25-6-A94-1007,ak | provides four effects : the reduction of <term> | analysis cost | </term> , the improvement of <term> word disambiguation | #25725 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction ofanalysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| tech,31-6-A94-1007,ak | analysis cost </term> , the improvement of <term> | word disambiguation | </term> , the <term> interpretation </term> of | #25731 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement ofword disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,35-6-A94-1007,ak | <term> word disambiguation </term> , the <term> | interpretation | </term> of <term> ellipses </term> , and <term> | #25735 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, theinterpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| tech,40-6-A94-1007,ak | </term> of <term> ellipses </term> , and <term> | robust analysis | </term> . This <term> model </term> was practically | #25740 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, androbust analysis. |
