#25567The authors propose a model for analyzingEnglish sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.
other,10-1-A94-1007,ak
<term>
English sentences
</term>
including
<term>
coordinate conjunctions
</term>
such as and , or , but and the equivalent
#25570The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences includingcoordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.
other,22-1-A94-1007,ak
and , or , but and the equivalent
<term>
words
</term>
.
<term>
Syntactic analysis
</term>
of
#25582The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords.
other,4-2-A94-1007,ak
<term>
Syntactic analysis
</term>
of the
<term>
English coordinate sentences
</term>
is one of the most difficult problems
#25588Syntactic analysis of theEnglish coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems.
tech,15-2-A94-1007,ak
of the most difficult problems for
<term>
machine translation ( MT ) systems
</term>
. The problem is selecting , from
#25599Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems formachine translation ( MT ) systems.
other,8-3-A94-1007,ak
problem is selecting , from all possible
<term>
candidates
</term>
, the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
#25614The problem is selecting, from all possiblecandidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
model,12-3-A94-1007,ak
<term>
candidates
</term>
, the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
</term>
formed by an individual
<term>
coordinate
#25618The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
other,24-3-A94-1007,ak
conjunction
</term>
, i.e. determining which
<term>
constituents
</term>
are coordinated by the
<term>
conjunction
#25630The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining whichconstituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
other,29-3-A94-1007,ak
constituents
</term>
are coordinated by the
<term>
conjunction
</term>
. Typically , so many possible
<term>
#25635The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by theconjunction.
model,5-4-A94-1007,ak
</term>
. Typically , so many possible
<term>
structures
</term>
are produced that
<term>
MT systems
#25642Typically, so many possiblestructures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
tech,9-4-A94-1007,ak
structures
</term>
are produced that
<term>
MT systems
</term>
can not select the correct one ,
#25646Typically, so many possible structures are produced thatMT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
lr,21-4-A94-1007,ak
select the correct one , even if the
<term>
grammars
</term>
allow to write the
<term>
rules
</term>
#25658Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if thegrammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
model,26-4-A94-1007,ak
<term>
grammars
</term>
allow to write the
<term>
rules
</term>
in the simple notations . This paper
#25663Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write therules in the simple notations.
model,4-5-A94-1007,ak
notations . This paper presents an
<term>
English coordinate structure analysis model
</term>
, which provides
<term>
top-down scope
#25673This paper presents anEnglish coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
other,12-5-A94-1007,ak
analysis model
</term>
, which provides
<term>
top-down scope information
</term>
of the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
#25681This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
model,18-5-A94-1007,ak
scope information
</term>
of the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
</term>
by taking advantage of the symmetric
#25687This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
other,26-5-A94-1007,ak
taking advantage of the symmetric
<term>
patterns
</term>
of the
<term>
parallelism
</term>
. The
#25695This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetricpatterns of the parallelism.
other,29-5-A94-1007,ak
symmetric
<term>
patterns
</term>
of the
<term>
parallelism
</term>
. The
<term>
model
</term>
is based on
#25698This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism.
model,1-6-A94-1007,ak
of the
<term>
parallelism
</term>
. The
<term>
model
</term>
is based on a
<term>
balance matching
#25701Themodel is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis.
tech,6-6-A94-1007,ak
The
<term>
model
</term>
is based on a
<term>
balance matching operation
</term>
for two lists of the
<term>
feature
#25706The model is based on abalance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis.