| other,29-5-A94-1007,ak | symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> | parallelism | </term> . The <term> model </term> is based on | #25698 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism. | |
| other,26-5-A94-1007,ak | taking advantage of the symmetric <term> | patterns | </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> . The | #25695 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetricpatterns of the parallelism. | |
| tech,40-6-A94-1007,ak | </term> of <term> ellipses </term> , and <term> | robust analysis | </term> . This <term> model </term> was practically | #25740 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, androbust analysis. | |
| model,26-4-A94-1007,ak | <term> grammars </term> allow to write the <term> | rules | </term> in the simple notations . This paper | #25663 Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write therules in the simple notations. | |
| model,5-4-A94-1007,ak | </term> . Typically , so many possible <term> | structures | </term> are produced that <term> MT systems | #25642 Typically, so many possiblestructures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. | |
| tech,0-2-A94-1007,ak | the equivalent <term> words </term> . <term> | Syntactic analysis | </term> of the <term> English coordinate sentences | #25584 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems. | |
| model,12-3-A94-1007,ak | <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate | #25618 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| model,18-5-A94-1007,ak | scope information </term> of the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric | #25687 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,12-5-A94-1007,ak | analysis model </term> , which provides <term> | top-down scope information | </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure | #25681 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| tech,31-6-A94-1007,ak | analysis cost </term> , the improvement of <term> | word disambiguation | </term> , the <term> interpretation </term> of | #25731 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement ofword disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,22-1-A94-1007,ak | and , or , but and the equivalent <term> | words | </term> . <term> Syntactic analysis </term> of | #25582 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords. |
