| other,4-2-A94-1007,ak | <term> Syntactic analysis </term> of the <term> | English coordinate sentences | </term> is one of the most difficult problems | #25588 Syntactic analysis of theEnglish coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems. | |
| model,1-7-A94-1007,ak | <term> robust analysis </term> . This <term> | model | </term> was practically implemented and incorporated | #25744 Thismodel was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75% accuracy in the practical translation use. | |
| model,5-4-A94-1007,ak | </term> . Typically , so many possible <term> | structures | </term> are produced that <term> MT systems | #25642 Typically, so many possiblestructures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. | |
| model,4-5-A94-1007,ak | notations . This paper presents an <term> | English coordinate structure analysis model | </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope | #25673 This paper presents anEnglish coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| tech,31-6-A94-1007,ak | analysis cost </term> , the improvement of <term> | word disambiguation | </term> , the <term> interpretation </term> of | #25731 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement ofword disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,12-5-A94-1007,ak | analysis model </term> , which provides <term> | top-down scope information | </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure | #25681 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| model,18-5-A94-1007,ak | scope information </term> of the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric | #25687 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| tech,9-7-A94-1007,ak | implemented and incorporated into the <term> | English-Japanese MT system | </term> , and provided about 75 % <term> accuracy | #25752 This model was practically implemented and incorporated into theEnglish-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75% accuracy in the practical translation use. | |
| other,37-6-A94-1007,ak | , the <term> interpretation </term> of <term> | ellipses | </term> , and <term> robust analysis </term> | #25737 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation ofellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,24-3-A94-1007,ak | conjunction </term> , i.e. determining which <term> | constituents | </term> are coordinated by the <term> conjunction | #25630 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining whichconstituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| tech,0-2-A94-1007,ak | the equivalent <term> words </term> . <term> | Syntactic analysis | </term> of the <term> English coordinate sentences | #25584 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems. | |
| other,14-6-A94-1007,ak | operation </term> for two lists of the <term> | feature sets | </term> , which provides four effects : the | #25714 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of thefeature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,29-5-A94-1007,ak | symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> | parallelism | </term> . The <term> model </term> is based on | #25698 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism. | |
| other,22-1-A94-1007,ak | and , or , but and the equivalent <term> | words | </term> . <term> Syntactic analysis </term> of | #25582 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords. | |
| other,7-1-A94-1007,ak | authors propose a model for analyzing <term> | English sentences | </term> including <term> coordinate conjunctions | #25567 The authors propose a model for analyzingEnglish sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words. | |
| other,25-6-A94-1007,ak | provides four effects : the reduction of <term> | analysis cost | </term> , the improvement of <term> word disambiguation | #25725 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction ofanalysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,35-6-A94-1007,ak | <term> word disambiguation </term> , the <term> | interpretation | </term> of <term> ellipses </term> , and <term> | #25735 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, theinterpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,26-5-A94-1007,ak | taking advantage of the symmetric <term> | patterns | </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> . The | #25695 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetricpatterns of the parallelism. | |
| lr,21-4-A94-1007,ak | select the correct one , even if the <term> | grammars | </term> allow to write the <term> rules </term> | #25658 Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if thegrammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. | |
| other,18-3-A94-1007,ak | structure </term> formed by an individual <term> | coordinate conjunction | </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents | #25624 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individualcoordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. |
