Concordance

Query A94-1007 31 >
Subparts filter 31 (992.5 per million)

other,7-1-A94-1007,ak	The authors propose a model for analyzing <term> English sentences </term> including <term> coordinate conjunctions </term> such as and , or , but and the equivalent <term> words </term> .	#25567 The authors propose a model for analyzingEnglish sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.
other,10-1-A94-1007,ak	The authors propose a model for analyzing <term> English sentences </term> including <term> coordinate conjunctions </term> such as and , or , but and the equivalent <term> words </term> .	#25570 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences includingcoordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.
other,22-1-A94-1007,ak	The authors propose a model for analyzing <term> English sentences </term> including <term> coordinate conjunctions </term> such as and , or , but and the equivalent <term> words </term> .	#25582 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords.
tech,0-2-A94-1007,ak	The authors propose a model for analyzing <term> English sentences </term> including <term> coordinate conjunctions </term> such as and , or , but and the equivalent <term> words </term> . <term> Syntactic analysis </term> of the <term> English coordinate sentences </term> is one of the most difficult problems for <term> machine translation ( MT ) systems </term> .	#25584 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems.
other,4-2-A94-1007,ak	<term> Syntactic analysis </term> of the <term> English coordinate sentences </term> is one of the most difficult problems for <term> machine translation ( MT ) systems </term> .	#25588 Syntactic analysis of theEnglish coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems.
tech,15-2-A94-1007,ak	<term> Syntactic analysis </term> of the <term> English coordinate sentences </term> is one of the most difficult problems for <term> machine translation ( MT ) systems </term> .	#25599 Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems formachine translation ( MT ) systems.
other,8-3-A94-1007,ak	The problem is selecting , from all possible <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate conjunction </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents </term> are coordinated by the <term> conjunction </term> .	#25614 The problem is selecting, from all possiblecandidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
model,12-3-A94-1007,ak	The problem is selecting , from all possible <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate conjunction </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents </term> are coordinated by the <term> conjunction </term> .	#25618 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
other,18-3-A94-1007,ak	The problem is selecting , from all possible <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate conjunction </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents </term> are coordinated by the <term> conjunction </term> .	#25624 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individualcoordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
other,24-3-A94-1007,ak	The problem is selecting , from all possible <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate conjunction </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents </term> are coordinated by the <term> conjunction </term> .	#25630 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining whichconstituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
other,29-3-A94-1007,ak	The problem is selecting , from all possible <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate conjunction </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents </term> are coordinated by the <term> conjunction </term> .	#25635 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by theconjunction.
model,5-4-A94-1007,ak	Typically , so many possible <term> structures </term> are produced that <term> MT systems </term> can not select the correct one , even if the <term> grammars </term> allow to write the <term> rules </term> in the simple notations .	#25642 Typically, so many possiblestructures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
tech,9-4-A94-1007,ak	Typically , so many possible <term> structures </term> are produced that <term> MT systems </term> can not select the correct one , even if the <term> grammars </term> allow to write the <term> rules </term> in the simple notations .	#25646 Typically, so many possible structures are produced thatMT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
lr,21-4-A94-1007,ak	Typically , so many possible <term> structures </term> are produced that <term> MT systems </term> can not select the correct one , even if the <term> grammars </term> allow to write the <term> rules </term> in the simple notations .	#25658 Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if thegrammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
model,26-4-A94-1007,ak	Typically , so many possible <term> structures </term> are produced that <term> MT systems </term> can not select the correct one , even if the <term> grammars </term> allow to write the <term> rules </term> in the simple notations .	#25663 Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write therules in the simple notations.
model,4-5-A94-1007,ak	This paper presents an <term> English coordinate structure analysis model </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope information </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> .	#25673 This paper presents anEnglish coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
other,12-5-A94-1007,ak	This paper presents an <term> English coordinate structure analysis model </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope information </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> .	#25681 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
model,18-5-A94-1007,ak	This paper presents an <term> English coordinate structure analysis model </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope information </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> .	#25687 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
other,26-5-A94-1007,ak	This paper presents an <term> English coordinate structure analysis model </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope information </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> .	#25695 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetricpatterns of the parallelism.
other,29-5-A94-1007,ak	This paper presents an <term> English coordinate structure analysis model </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope information </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> .	#25698 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism.


	in Help