tech,9-2-H01-1040,bq information is used in a <term> prototype system </term> designed to support <term> information
tech,13-3-H01-1040,bq qualitative user evaluation </term> of the <term> system </term> , which while broadly positive indicates
tech,10-1-H01-1041,bq <term> Korean-to-English machine translation system </term><term> CCLINC ( Common Coalition Language
tool,1-2-H01-1041,bq <term> CCLINC Korean-to-English translation system </term> consists of two <term> core modules
tech,5-3-H01-1041,bq frame </term> . The key features of the <term> system </term> include : ( i ) Robust efficient <term>
tech,3-5-H01-1041,bq target language </term> . ( iii ) <term> Rapid system development </term> and porting to new <term>
tech,15-6-H01-1041,bq chemical biological warfare , the <term> system </term> produces the <term> translation output
tech,3-2-H01-1049,bq integrate a <term> spoken language understanding system </term> with <term> intelligent mobile agents
personnel can converse with their logistics system to place a supply or information request
tech,5-6-H01-1049,bq Requestors </term> can also instruct the <term> system </term> to notify them when the status of
other,3-3-H01-1055,bq the <term> user </term> . The issue of <term> system response </term> to <term> users </term> has
measure(ment),7-2-H01-1068,bq measure <term> user satisfaction </term> , <term> system support of mission success </term> and <term>
tech,23-1-P01-1004,bq performance </term> of a <term> translation memory system </term> . We take a selection of both <term>
tech,12-2-P01-1056,bq planner </term> for a <term> spoken dialogue system </term> by eliciting <term> subjective human
tech,22-4-P01-1056,bq </term> , and as well as the <term> hand-crafted system </term> . We describe a set of <term> supervised
other,11-4-N03-1001,bq on three different <term> spoken language system domains </term> . Motivated by the success
other,17-4-N03-1004,bq relative improvement over our <term> baseline system </term> in the number of <term> questions correctly
paper we present <term> ONTOSCORE </term> , a system for scoring sets of <term> concepts </term>
tech,3-2-N03-1012,bq <term> ontology </term> . We apply our <term> system </term> to the task of <term> scoring </term>
tech,4-4-N03-1012,bq hypotheses </term> . An evaluation of our <term> system </term> against the <term> annotated data </term>
hide detail