tech,4-1-P03-1031,bq |
hypothesis . This paper concerns the
<term>
|
discourse
|
understanding process
</term>
in
<term>
spoken
|
#4130
This paper concerns thediscourse understanding process in spoken dialogue systems. |
measure(ment),17-4-P03-1031,bq |
<term>
dialogue
</term>
progresses , the
<term>
|
discourse
|
understanding accuracy
</term>
can be improved
|
#4209
By holding multiple candidates for understanding results and resolving the ambiguity as the dialogue progresses, thediscourse understanding accuracy can be improved. |
tech,16-6-P03-1031,bq |
method
</term>
enables easy design of the
<term>
|
discourse
|
understanding process
</term>
. Experiment
|
#4250
Unlike conventional methods that use hand-crafted rules, the proposed method enables easy design of thediscourse understanding process. |
other,20-3-C04-1128,bq |
upon
<term>
lexical similarity
</term>
of
<term>
|
discourse
|
segments
</term>
for
<term>
question-answer
|
#6302
We show that various features based on the structure of email-threads can be used to improve upon lexical similarity ofdiscourse segments for question-answer pairing. |
other,15-1-N04-1024,bq |
<term>
writing
</term>
with
<term>
essay-based
|
discourse
|
elements
</term>
( e.g. ,
<term>
thesis statements
|
#6661
CriterionSM Online Essay Evaluation Service includes a capability that labels sentences in student writing with essay-based discourse elements (e.g., thesis statements). |
other,12-3-N04-1024,bq |
semantic similarity measures
</term>
and
<term>
|
discourse
|
structure
</term>
. A
<term>
support vector
|
#6702
This system identifies features of sentences based on semantic similarity measures anddiscourse structure. |
other,22-4-N04-1024,bq |
question
</term>
and relatedness between
<term>
|
discourse
|
elements
</term>
.
<term>
Intra-sentential
|
#6727
A support vector machine uses these features to capture breakdowns in coherence due to relatedness to the essay question and relatedness betweendiscourse elements. |
other,7-1-J86-3001,bq |
this paper we explore a new
<term>
theory of
|
discourse
|
structure
</term>
that stresses the role
|
#14089
In this paper we explore a new theory of discourse structure that stresses the role of purpose and processing in discourse. |
other,20-1-J86-3001,bq |
</term>
and
<term>
processing
</term>
in
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
. In this theory ,
<term>
discourse
|
#14100
In this paper we explore a new theory of discourse structure that stresses the role of purpose and processing indiscourse. |
other,4-2-J86-3001,bq |
discourse
</term>
. In this theory ,
<term>
|
discourse
|
structure
</term>
is composed of three separate
|
#14106
In this theory,discourse structure is composed of three separate but interrelated components: the structure of the sequence of utterances (called the linguistic structure), a structure of purposes (called the intentional structure), and the state of focus of attention (called the attentional state). |
other,8-3-J86-3001,bq |
</term>
consists of segments of the
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
into which the
<term>
utterances
</term>
|
#14164
The linguistic structure consists of segments of thediscourse into which the utterances naturally aggregate. |
other,16-5-J86-3001,bq |
the
<term>
participants
</term>
as the
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
unfolds . The
<term>
attentional state
|
#14210
The attentional state is an abstraction of the focus of attention of the participants as thediscourse unfolds. |
other,23-6-J86-3001,bq |
that are salient at each point of the
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
. The distinction among these components
|
#14236
The attentional state, being dynamic, records the objects, properties, and relations that are salient at each point of thediscourse. |
other,14-7-J86-3001,bq |
provide an adequate explanation of such
<term>
|
discourse
|
phenomena
</term>
as
<term>
cue phrases
</term>
|
#14252
The distinction among these components is essential to provide an adequate explanation of suchdiscourse phenomena as cue phrases, referring expressions, and interruptions. |
other,3-9-J86-3001,bq |
discourses
</term>
. Various properties of
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
are described , and explanations
|
#14290
Various properties ofdiscourse are described, and explanations for the behaviour of cue phrases, referring expressions, and interruptions are explored. |
other,13-10-J86-3001,bq |
processing of
<term>
utterances
</term>
in a
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
.
<term>
Discourse processing
</term>
|
#14324
This theory provides a framework for describing the processing of utterances in adiscourse. |
other,9-11-J86-3001,bq |
how the
<term>
utterances
</term>
of the
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
aggregate into
<term>
segments
</term>
|
#14335
Discourse processing requires recognizing how the utterances of thediscourse aggregate into segments, recognizing the intentions expressed in the discourse and the relationships among intentions, and tracking the discourse through the operation of the mechanisms associated with attentional state. |
other,20-11-J86-3001,bq |
<term>
intentions
</term>
expressed in the
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
and the relationships among
<term>
|
#14346
Discourse processing requires recognizing how the utterances of the discourse aggregate into segments, recognizing the intentions expressed in thediscourse and the relationships among intentions, and tracking the discourse through the operation of the mechanisms associated with attentional state. |
other,30-11-J86-3001,bq |
intentions
</term>
, and tracking the
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
through the operation of the mechanisms
|
#14356
Discourse processing requires recognizing how the utterances of the discourse aggregate into segments, recognizing the intentions expressed in the discourse and the relationships among intentions, and tracking thediscourse through the operation of the mechanisms associated with attentional state. |
other,14-12-J86-3001,bq |
</term>
the role of information from the
<term>
|
discourse
|
</term>
and from the
<term>
participants
</term>
|
#14382
This processing description specifies in these recognition tasks the role of information from thediscourse and from the participants' knowledge of the domain. |