other,7-1-P86-1011,bq |
examine the relationship between the two
<term>
|
grammatical formalisms
|
</term>
:
<term>
Tree Adjoining Grammars
</term>
|
#14587
We examine the relationship between the twogrammatical formalisms: Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars. |
other,10-1-P86-1011,bq |
<term>
grammatical formalisms
</term>
:
<term>
|
Tree Adjoining Grammars
|
</term>
and
<term>
Head Grammars
</term>
. We
|
#14590
We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms:Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars. |
other,14-1-P86-1011,bq |
<term>
Tree Adjoining Grammars
</term>
and
<term>
|
Head Grammars
|
</term>
. We briefly investigate the weak
|
#14594
We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms: Tree Adjoining Grammars andHead Grammars. |
other,5-2-P86-1011,bq |
</term>
. We briefly investigate the weak
<term>
|
equivalence
|
</term>
of the two
<term>
formalisms
</term>
|
#14602
We briefly investigate the weakequivalence of the two formalisms. |
other,9-2-P86-1011,bq |
<term>
equivalence
</term>
of the two
<term>
|
formalisms
|
</term>
. We then turn to a discussion comparing
|
#14606
We briefly investigate the weak equivalence of the twoformalisms. |
other,8-3-P86-1011,bq |
turn to a discussion comparing the
<term>
|
linguistic expressiveness
|
</term>
of the two
<term>
formalisms
</term>
|
#14616
We then turn to a discussion comparing thelinguistic expressiveness of the two formalisms. |
other,13-3-P86-1011,bq |
linguistic expressiveness
</term>
of the two
<term>
|
formalisms
|
</term>
.
<term>
Unification-based grammar
|
#14621
We then turn to a discussion comparing the linguistic expressiveness of the twoformalisms. |