other,8-1-P99-1062,ak |
presents a new method of analyzing
<term>
|
Japanese noun phrases
|
</term>
of the form N1 no N2 . The
<term>
Japanese
|
#31027
This paper presents a new method of analyzingJapanese noun phrases of the form N1 no N2. |
|
other,1-2-P99-1062,ak |
phrases
</term>
of the form N1 no N2 . The
<term>
|
Japanese postposition no
|
</term>
roughly corresponds to of , but it
|
#31038
TheJapanese postposition no roughly corresponds to of, but it has much broader usage. |
|
other,14-2-P99-1062,ak |
corresponds to of , but it has much broader
<term>
|
usage
|
</term>
. The method exploits a
<term>
definition
|
#31051
The Japanese postposition no roughly corresponds to of, but it has much broaderusage. |
|
model,4-3-P99-1062,ak |
usage
</term>
. The method exploits a
<term>
|
definition
|
</term>
of N2 in a
<term>
dictionary
</term>
|
#31057
The method exploits adefinition of N2 in a dictionary. |
|
lr,9-3-P99-1062,ak |
a
<term>
definition
</term>
of N2 in a
<term>
|
dictionary
|
</term>
. For example , rugby no coach can
|
#31062
The method exploits a definition of N2 in adictionary. |
|
other,12-5-P99-1062,ak |
the method by the analysis of 300
<term>
|
test noun phrases
|
</term>
.
<term>
STRAND
</term>
( Resnik , 1998
|
#31094
We illustrate the effectiveness of the method by the analysis of 300test noun phrases. |
|