#15173Informally, adisposition is a proposition which is preponderantly, but not necessarily always, true.
other,6-1-P84-1064,ak
Informally , a
<term>
disposition
</term>
is a
<term>
proposition
</term>
which is preponderantly , but not
#15176Informally, a disposition is aproposition which is preponderantly, but not necessarily always, true.
other,8-2-P84-1064,ak
. For example , birds can fly is a
<term>
disposition
</term>
, as are the
<term>
propositions
</term>
#15196For example, birds can fly is adisposition, as are the propositions Swedes are blond and Spaniards are dark.
other,13-2-P84-1064,ak
<term>
disposition
</term>
, as are the
<term>
propositions
</term>
Swedes are blond and Spaniards are
#15201For example, birds can fly is a disposition, as are thepropositions Swedes are blond and Spaniards are dark.
other,13-3-P84-1064,ak
described in this paper is that a
<term>
disposition
</term>
may be viewed as a
<term>
proposition
#15223An idea which underlies the theory described in this paper is that adisposition may be viewed as a proposition with implicit fuzzy quantifiers which are approximations to all and always, e.g., almost all, almost always, most, frequently, etc.
other,19-3-P84-1064,ak
disposition
</term>
may be viewed as a
<term>
proposition
</term>
with
<term>
implicit fuzzy quantifiers
#15229An idea which underlies the theory described in this paper is that a disposition may be viewed as aproposition with implicit fuzzy quantifiers which are approximations to all and always, e.g., almost all, almost always, most, frequently, etc.
other,21-3-P84-1064,ak
viewed as a
<term>
proposition
</term>
with
<term>
implicit fuzzy quantifiers
</term>
which are approximations to all and
#15231An idea which underlies the theory described in this paper is that a disposition may be viewed as a proposition withimplicit fuzzy quantifiers which are approximations to all and always, e.g., almost all, almost always, most, frequently, etc.
other,15-4-P84-1064,ak
interpreted as the result of suppressing the
<term>
fuzzy quantifier
</term>
most in the
<term>
proposition
</term>
#15271For example, birds can fly may be interpreted as the result of suppressing thefuzzy quantifier most in the proposition most birds can fly.
other,20-4-P84-1064,ak
fuzzy quantifier
</term>
most in the
<term>
proposition
</term>
most birds can fly . Similarly ,
#15276For example, birds can fly may be interpreted as the result of suppressing the fuzzy quantifier most in theproposition most birds can fly.
other,5-6-P84-1064,ak
women . The process of transforming a
<term>
disposition
</term>
into a
<term>
proposition
</term>
is
#15306The process of transforming adisposition into a proposition is referred to as explicitation or restoration.
other,8-6-P84-1064,ak
transforming a
<term>
disposition
</term>
into a
<term>
proposition
</term>
is referred to as
<term>
explicitation
#15309The process of transforming a disposition into aproposition is referred to as explicitation or restoration.
tech,13-6-P84-1064,ak
proposition
</term>
is referred to as
<term>
explicitation
</term>
or
<term>
restoration
</term>
.
<term>
#15314The process of transforming a disposition into a proposition is referred to asexplicitation or restoration.
tech,15-6-P84-1064,ak
to as
<term>
explicitation
</term>
or
<term>
restoration
</term>
.
<term>
Explicitation
</term>
sets the
#15316The process of transforming a disposition into a proposition is referred to as explicitation orrestoration.
tech,0-7-P84-1064,ak
</term>
or
<term>
restoration
</term>
.
<term>
Explicitation
</term>
sets the stage for representing the
#15318The process of transforming a disposition into a proposition is referred to as explicitation or restoration.Explicitation sets the stage for representing the meaning of a proposition through the use of test-score semantics (Zadeh, 1978, 1982).
other,7-7-P84-1064,ak
sets the stage for representing the
<term>
meaning
</term>
of a
<term>
proposition
</term>
through
#15325Explicitation sets the stage for representing themeaning of a proposition through the use of test-score semantics (Zadeh, 1978, 1982).
other,10-7-P84-1064,ak
representing the
<term>
meaning
</term>
of a
<term>
proposition
</term>
through the use of
<term>
test-score
#15328Explicitation sets the stage for representing the meaning of aproposition through the use of test-score semantics (Zadeh, 1978, 1982).
other,15-7-P84-1064,ak
proposition
</term>
through the use of
<term>
test-score semantics
</term>
( Zadeh , 1978 , 1982 ) . In this
#15333Explicitation sets the stage for representing the meaning of a proposition through the use oftest-score semantics (Zadeh, 1978, 1982).
other,4-8-P84-1064,ak
1978 , 1982 ) . In this approach to
<term>
semantics
</term>
, the
<term>
meaning
</term>
of a
<term>
#15347In this approach tosemantics, the meaning of a proposition, p, is represented as a procedure which tests, scores and aggregates the elastic constraints which are induced by p.
other,7-8-P84-1064,ak
approach to
<term>
semantics
</term>
, the
<term>
meaning
</term>
of a
<term>
proposition
</term>
, p ,
#15350In this approach to semantics, themeaning of a proposition, p, is represented as a procedure which tests, scores and aggregates the elastic constraints which are induced by p.
other,10-8-P84-1064,ak
</term>
, the
<term>
meaning
</term>
of a
<term>
proposition
</term>
, p , is represented as a
<term>
procedure
#15353In this approach to semantics, the meaning of aproposition, p, is represented as a procedure which tests, scores and aggregates the elastic constraints which are induced by p.