| other,6-1-C88-1007,ak | paper discusses the application of <term> | Unification Categorial Grammar ( UCG ) | </term> to the framework of <term> Isomorphic | #17853 This paper discusses the application ofUnification Categorial Grammar ( UCG ) to the framework of Isomorphic Grammars for Machine Translation pioneered by Landsbergen. | |
| other,16-1-C88-1007,ak | ( UCG ) </term> to the framework of <term> | Isomorphic Grammars | </term> for <term> Machine Translation </term> | #17863 This paper discusses the application of Unification Categorial Grammar (UCG) to the framework ofIsomorphic Grammars for Machine Translation pioneered by Landsbergen. | |
| tech,19-1-C88-1007,ak | <term> Isomorphic Grammars </term> for <term> | Machine Translation | </term> pioneered by Landsbergen . The <term> | #17866 This paper discusses the application of Unification Categorial Grammar (UCG) to the framework of Isomorphic Grammars forMachine Translation pioneered by Landsbergen. | |
| tech,1-2-C88-1007,ak | </term> pioneered by Landsbergen . The <term> | Isomorphic Grammars approach | </term> to <term> MT </term> involves developing | #17873 TheIsomorphic Grammars approach to MT involves developing the grammars of the Source and Target languages in parallel, in order to ensure that SL and TL expressions which stand in the translation relation have isomorphic derivations. | |
| tech,5-2-C88-1007,ak | Isomorphic Grammars approach </term> to <term> | MT | </term> involves developing the <term> grammars | #17877 The Isomorphic Grammars approach toMT involves developing the grammars of the Source and Target languages in parallel, in order to ensure that SL and TL expressions which stand in the translation relation have isomorphic derivations. | |
| model,9-2-C88-1007,ak | <term> MT </term> involves developing the <term> | grammars | </term> of the <term> Source and Target languages | #17881 The Isomorphic Grammars approach to MT involves developing thegrammars of the Source and Target languages in parallel, in order to ensure that SL and TL expressions which stand in the translation relation have isomorphic derivations. | |
| other,12-2-C88-1007,ak | developing the <term> grammars </term> of the <term> | Source and Target languages | </term> in parallel , in order to ensure | #17884 The Isomorphic Grammars approach to MT involves developing the grammars of theSource and Target languages in parallel, in order to ensure that SL and TL expressions which stand in the translation relation have isomorphic derivations. | |
| other,24-2-C88-1007,ak | parallel , in order to ensure that <term> | SL and TL expressions | </term> which stand in the <term> translation | #17896 The Isomorphic Grammars approach to MT involves developing the grammars of the Source and Target languages in parallel, in order to ensure thatSL and TL expressions which stand in the translation relation have isomorphic derivations. | |
| other,32-2-C88-1007,ak | expressions </term> which stand in the <term> | translation relation | </term> have <term> isomorphic derivations </term> | #17904 The Isomorphic Grammars approach to MT involves developing the grammars of the Source and Target languages in parallel, in order to ensure that SL and TL expressions which stand in thetranslation relation have isomorphic derivations. | |
| other,35-2-C88-1007,ak | <term> translation relation </term> have <term> | isomorphic derivations | </term> . The principle advantage of this | #17907 The Isomorphic Grammars approach to MT involves developing the grammars of the Source and Target languages in parallel, in order to ensure that SL and TL expressions which stand in the translation relation haveisomorphic derivations. | |
| other,8-3-C88-1007,ak | advantage of this approach is that <term> | knowledge | </term> concerning <term> translation equivalence | #17918 The principle advantage of this approach is thatknowledge concerning translation equivalence of expressions may be directly exploited, obviating the need for answers to semantic questions that we do not yet have. | |
| other,10-3-C88-1007,ak | that <term> knowledge </term> concerning <term> | translation equivalence | </term> of <term> expressions </term> may be | #17920 The principle advantage of this approach is that knowledge concerningtranslation equivalence of expressions may be directly exploited, obviating the need for answers to semantic questions that we do not yet have. | |
| other,13-3-C88-1007,ak | <term> translation equivalence </term> of <term> | expressions | </term> may be directly exploited , obviating | #17923 The principle advantage of this approach is that knowledge concerning translation equivalence ofexpressions may be directly exploited, obviating the need for answers to semantic questions that we do not yet have. | |
| other,25-3-C88-1007,ak | obviating the need for answers to <term> | semantic questions | </term> that we do not yet have . <term> Semantic | #17935 The principle advantage of this approach is that knowledge concerning translation equivalence of expressions may be directly exploited, obviating the need for answers tosemantic questions that we do not yet have. | |
| other,0-4-C88-1007,ak | questions </term> that we do not yet have . <term> | Semantic and other information | </term> may still be incorporated , but as | #17944 The principle advantage of this approach is that knowledge concerning translation equivalence of expressions may be directly exploited, obviating the need for answers to semantic questions that we do not yet have.Semantic and other information may still be incorporated, but as constraints on the translation relation, not as levels of textual representation. | |
| model,11-4-C88-1007,ak | may still be incorporated , but as <term> | constraints | </term> on the <term> translation relation </term> | #17955 Semantic and other information may still be incorporated, but asconstraints on the translation relation, not as levels of textual representation. | |
| other,14-4-C88-1007,ak | but as <term> constraints </term> on the <term> | translation relation | </term> , not as levels of <term> textual representation | #17958 Semantic and other information may still be incorporated, but as constraints on thetranslation relation, not as levels of textual representation. | |
| other,21-4-C88-1007,ak | relation </term> , not as levels of <term> | textual representation | </term> . After introducing this approach | #17965 Semantic and other information may still be incorporated, but as constraints on the translation relation, not as levels oftextual representation. | |
| tech,5-5-C88-1007,ak | After introducing this approach to <term> | MT system design | </term> , and the basics of <term> monolingual | #17973 After introducing this approach toMT system design, and the basics of monolingual UCG, we will show how the two can be integrated, and present an example from an implemented bi-directional English-Spanish fragment. | |
| other,13-5-C88-1007,ak | system design </term> , and the basics of <term> | monolingual UCG | </term> , we will show how the two can be | #17981 After introducing this approach to MT system design, and the basics ofmonolingual UCG, we will show how the two can be integrated, and present an example from an implemented bi-directional English-Spanish fragment. |
