| tech,5-4-P91-1025,ak | </term> . The basic ingredients are an <term> | information lattice | </term> , a <term> representation scheme </term> | #22330 The basic ingredients are aninformation lattice, a representation scheme for utterances embedded in contexts, and a mismatch resolution scheme defined in terms of information flow. | |
| other,15-4-P91-1025,ak | <term> utterances </term> embedded in <term> | contexts | </term> , and a <term> mismatch resolution | #22340 The basic ingredients are an information lattice, a representation scheme for utterances embedded incontexts, and a mismatch resolution scheme defined in terms of information flow. | |
| other,11-5-P91-1025,ak | </term> between <term> English </term> and <term> | Japanese | </term> . It is often assumed that when <term> | #22365 We motivate our approach with examples of translation between English andJapanese. | |
| other,7-3-P91-1025,ak | translation framework </term> based on <term> | Situation Theory | </term> . The basic ingredients are an <term> | #22322 We propose a translation framework based onSituation Theory. | |
| other,14-1-P91-1025,ak | which they have <term> words </term> and <term> | grammatical constructs | </term> . Therefore <term> translation </term> | #22285 Languages differ in the concepts and real-world entities for which they have words andgrammatical constructs. | |
| other,26-4-P91-1025,ak | resolution scheme </term> defined in terms of <term> | information flow | </term> . We motivate our approach with examples | #22351 The basic ingredients are an information lattice, a representation scheme for utterances embedded in contexts, and a mismatch resolution scheme defined in terms ofinformation flow. | |
| other,24-2-P91-1025,ak | finding an exact counterpart in the <term> | target language | </term> . We propose a <term> translation framework | #22312 Therefore translation must sometimes be a matter of approximating the meaning of a source language text rather than finding an exact counterpart in thetarget language. | |
| other,12-1-P91-1025,ak | entities </term> for which they have <term> | words | </term> and <term> grammatical constructs </term> | #22283 Languages differ in the concepts and real-world entities for which they havewords and grammatical constructs. | |
| other,9-5-P91-1025,ak | of <term> translation </term> between <term> | English | </term> and <term> Japanese </term> . It is often | #22363 We motivate our approach with examples of translation betweenEnglish and Japanese. | |
| other,4-1-P91-1025,ak | <term> Languages </term> differ in the <term> | concepts | </term> and <term> real-world entities </term> | #22275 Languages differ in theconcepts and real-world entities for which they have words and grammatical constructs. | |
| tech,3-3-P91-1025,ak | target language </term> . We propose a <term> | translation framework | </term> based on <term> Situation Theory </term> | #22318 We propose atranslation framework based on Situation Theory. | |
| other,7-5-P91-1025,ak | motivate our approach with examples of <term> | translation | </term> between <term> English </term> and <term> | #22361 We motivate our approach with examples oftranslation between English and Japanese. | |
| tech,19-4-P91-1025,ak | embedded in <term> contexts </term> , and a <term> | mismatch resolution scheme | </term> defined in terms of <term> information | #22344 The basic ingredients are an information lattice, a representation scheme for utterances embedded in contexts, and amismatch resolution scheme defined in terms of information flow. | |
| other,0-1-P91-1025,ak | </term> for <term> news story text </term> . <term> | Languages | </term> differ in the <term> concepts </term> | #22271 Overall, this research concludes that CSG is a computationally and conceptually tractable approach to the construction of phrase structure grammar for news story text.Languages differ in the concepts and real-world entities for which they have words and grammatical constructs. | |
| other,12-4-P91-1025,ak | <term> representation scheme </term> for <term> | utterances | </term> embedded in <term> contexts </term> , | #22337 The basic ingredients are an information lattice, a representation scheme forutterances embedded in contexts, and a mismatch resolution scheme defined in terms of information flow. | |
| tech,9-4-P91-1025,ak | <term> information lattice </term> , a <term> | representation scheme | </term> for <term> utterances </term> embedded | #22334 The basic ingredients are an information lattice, arepresentation scheme for utterances embedded in contexts, and a mismatch resolution scheme defined in terms of information flow. | |
| other,6-1-P91-1025,ak | differ in the <term> concepts </term> and <term> | real-world entities | </term> for which they have <term> words </term> | #22277 Languages differ in the concepts andreal-world entities for which they have words and grammatical constructs. | |
| tech,1-2-P91-1025,ak | grammatical constructs </term> . Therefore <term> | translation | </term> must sometimes be a matter of approximating | #22289 Thereforetranslation must sometimes be a matter of approximating the meaning of a source language text rather than finding an exact counterpart in the target language. | |
| other,10-2-P91-1025,ak | sometimes be a matter of approximating the <term> | meaning | </term> of a <term> source language text </term> | #22298 Therefore translation must sometimes be a matter of approximating themeaning of a source language text rather than finding an exact counterpart in the target language. | |
| other,13-2-P91-1025,ak | approximating the <term> meaning </term> of a <term> | source language text | </term> rather than finding an exact counterpart | #22301 Therefore translation must sometimes be a matter of approximating the meaning of asource language text rather than finding an exact counterpart in the target language. |
