| other,7-1-P86-1011,ak | examine the relationship between the two <term> | grammatical formalisms | </term> : <term> Tree Adjoining Grammars </term> | #16770 We examine the relationship between the twogrammatical formalisms: Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars. | |
| tech,10-1-P86-1011,ak | <term> grammatical formalisms </term> : <term> | Tree Adjoining Grammars | </term> and <term> Head Grammars </term> . We | #16773 We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms:Tree Adjoining Grammars and Head Grammars. | |
| tech,14-1-P86-1011,ak | <term> Tree Adjoining Grammars </term> and <term> | Head Grammars | </term> . We briefly investigate the weak | #16777 We examine the relationship between the two grammatical formalisms: Tree Adjoining Grammars andHead Grammars. | |
| other,9-2-P86-1011,ak | investigate the weak equivalence of the two <term> | formalisms | </term> . We then turn to a discussion comparing | #16789 We briefly investigate the weak equivalence of the twoformalisms. | |
| other,8-3-P86-1011,ak | turn to a discussion comparing the <term> | linguistic expressiveness | </term> of the two <term> formalisms </term> | #16799 We then turn to a discussion comparing thelinguistic expressiveness of the two formalisms. | |
| other,13-3-P86-1011,ak | linguistic expressiveness </term> of the two <term> | formalisms | </term> . <term> Unification-based grammar | #16804 We then turn to a discussion comparing the linguistic expressiveness of the twoformalisms. |
