| tech,1-1-P81-1032,ak | limited-domain computer system </term> . Robust <term> | natural language interpretation | </term> requires strong <term> semantic domain | #13727 Robustnatural language interpretation requires strong semantic domain models, fail-soft recovery heuristics, and very flexible control structures. | |
| model,6-1-P81-1032,ak | interpretation </term> requires strong <term> | semantic domain models | </term> , <term> fail-soft recovery heuristics | #13732 Robust natural language interpretation requires strongsemantic domain models, fail-soft recovery heuristics, and very flexible control structures. | |
| tech,10-1-P81-1032,ak | <term> semantic domain models </term> , <term> | fail-soft recovery heuristics | </term> , and very flexible <term> control | #13736 Robust natural language interpretation requires strong semantic domain models,fail-soft recovery heuristics, and very flexible control structures. | |
| tech,17-1-P81-1032,ak | heuristics </term> , and very flexible <term> | control structures | </term> . Although <term> single-strategy parsers | #13743 Robust natural language interpretation requires strong semantic domain models, fail-soft recovery heuristics, and very flexiblecontrol structures. | |
| tech,1-2-P81-1032,ak | control structures </term> . Although <term> | single-strategy parsers | </term> have met with a measure of success | #13747 Althoughsingle-strategy parsers have met with a measure of success, a multi-strategy approach is shown to provide a much higher degree of flexibility, redundancy, and ability to bring task-specific domain knowledge (in addition to general linguistic knowledge) to bear on both grammatical and ungrammatical input. | |
| other,25-2-P81-1032,ak | much higher degree of flexibility , <term> | redundancy | </term> , and ability to bring <term> task-specific | #13771 Although single-strategy parsers have met with a measure of success, a multi-strategy approach is shown to provide a much higher degree of flexibility,redundancy, and ability to bring task-specific domain knowledge (in addition to general linguistic knowledge) to bear on both grammatical and ungrammatical input. | |
| other,31-2-P81-1032,ak | redundancy </term> , and ability to bring <term> | task-specific domain knowledge | </term> ( in addition to <term> general linguistic | #13777 Although single-strategy parsers have met with a measure of success, a multi-strategy approach is shown to provide a much higher degree of flexibility, redundancy, and ability to bringtask-specific domain knowledge (in addition to general linguistic knowledge) to bear on both grammatical and ungrammatical input. | |
| other,38-2-P81-1032,ak | domain knowledge </term> ( in addition to <term> | general linguistic knowledge | </term> ) to bear on both <term> grammatical | #13784 Although single-strategy parsers have met with a measure of success, a multi-strategy approach is shown to provide a much higher degree of flexibility, redundancy, and ability to bring task-specific domain knowledge (in addition togeneral linguistic knowledge) to bear on both grammatical and ungrammatical input. | |
| other,46-2-P81-1032,ak | knowledge </term> ) to bear on both <term> | grammatical and ungrammatical input | </term> . A <term> parsing algorithm </term> | #13792 Although single-strategy parsers have met with a measure of success, a multi-strategy approach is shown to provide a much higher degree of flexibility, redundancy, and ability to bring task-specific domain knowledge (in addition to general linguistic knowledge) to bear on bothgrammatical and ungrammatical input. | |
| tech,1-3-P81-1032,ak | and ungrammatical input </term> . A <term> | parsing algorithm | </term> is presented that integrates several | #13798 Aparsing algorithm is presented that integrates several different parsing strategies, with case-frame instantiation dominating. | |
| tech,9-3-P81-1032,ak | that integrates several different <term> | parsing strategies | </term> , with <term> case-frame instantiation | #13806 A parsing algorithm is presented that integrates several differentparsing strategies, with case-frame instantiation dominating. | |
| tech,13-3-P81-1032,ak | <term> parsing strategies </term> , with <term> | case-frame instantiation | </term> dominating . Each of these <term> parsing | #13810 A parsing algorithm is presented that integrates several different parsing strategies, withcase-frame instantiation dominating. | |
| tech,3-4-P81-1032,ak | instantiation </term> dominating . Each of these <term> | parsing strategies | </term> exploits different types of <term> | #13817 Each of theseparsing strategies exploits different types of knowledge; and their combination provides a strong framework in which to process conjunctions, fragmentary input, and ungrammatical structures, as well as less exotic, grammatically correct input. | |
| other,9-4-P81-1032,ak | </term> exploits different types of <term> | knowledge | </term> ; and their combination provides | #13823 Each of these parsing strategies exploits different types ofknowledge; and their combination provides a strong framework in which to process conjunctions, fragmentary input, and ungrammatical structures, as well as less exotic, grammatically correct input. | |
| other,22-4-P81-1032,ak | strong framework in which to process <term> | conjunctions | </term> , <term> fragmentary input </term> , | #13836 Each of these parsing strategies exploits different types of knowledge; and their combination provides a strong framework in which to processconjunctions, fragmentary input, and ungrammatical structures, as well as less exotic, grammatically correct input. | |
| other,24-4-P81-1032,ak | process <term> conjunctions </term> , <term> | fragmentary input | </term> , and <term> ungrammatical structures | #13838 Each of these parsing strategies exploits different types of knowledge; and their combination provides a strong framework in which to process conjunctions,fragmentary input, and ungrammatical structures, as well as less exotic, grammatically correct input. | |
| other,28-4-P81-1032,ak | <term> fragmentary input </term> , and <term> | ungrammatical structures | </term> , as well as less exotic , <term> grammatically | #13842 Each of these parsing strategies exploits different types of knowledge; and their combination provides a strong framework in which to process conjunctions, fragmentary input, andungrammatical structures, as well as less exotic, grammatically correct input. | |
| other,37-4-P81-1032,ak | structures </term> , as well as less exotic , <term> | grammatically correct input | </term> . Several specific <term> heuristics | #13851 Each of these parsing strategies exploits different types of knowledge; and their combination provides a strong framework in which to process conjunctions, fragmentary input, and ungrammatical structures, as well as less exotic,grammatically correct input. | |
| tech,2-5-P81-1032,ak | correct input </term> . Several specific <term> | heuristics | </term> for handling <term> ungrammatical input | #13857 Several specificheuristics for handling ungrammatical input are presented within this multi-strategy framework. | |
| other,5-5-P81-1032,ak | <term> heuristics </term> for handling <term> | ungrammatical input | </term> are presented within this multi-strategy | #13860 Several specific heuristics for handlingungrammatical input are presented within this multi-strategy framework. |
