| other,5-1-H89-1036,ak | performance . In our approach , each <term> | elementary structure | </term> is systematically associated with | #19532 In our approach, eachelementary structure is systematically associated with a lexical head. | |
| other,12-1-H89-1036,ak | is systematically associated with a <term> | lexical head | </term> . These structures specify <term> extended | #19539 In our approach, each elementary structure is systematically associated with alexical head. | |
| other,3-2-H89-1036,ak | head </term> . These structures specify <term> | extended domains of locality | </term> ( as compared to a <term> context-free | #19545 These structures specifyextended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| other,12-2-H89-1036,ak | locality </term> ( as compared to a <term> | context-free grammar | </term> ) over which <term> constraints </term> | #19554 These structures specify extended domains of locality (as compared to acontext-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| model,17-2-H89-1036,ak | context-free grammar </term> ) over which <term> | constraints | </term> can be stated . These <term> constraints | #19559 These structures specify extended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over whichconstraints can be stated. | |
| model,1-3-H89-1036,ak | constraints </term> can be stated . These <term> | constraints | </term> either hold within the <term> elementary | #19565 Theseconstraints either hold within the elementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a given elementary structure. | |
| other,6-3-H89-1036,ak | constraints </term> either hold within the <term> | elementary structure | </term> itself or specify what other structures | #19570 These constraints either hold within theelementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a given elementary structure. | |
| other,20-3-H89-1036,ak | structures can be composed with a given <term> | elementary structure | </term> . The <term> ' grammar ' </term> consists | #19584 These constraints either hold within the elementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a givenelementary structure. | |
| lr,1-4-H89-1036,ak | <term> elementary structure </term> . The <term> | ' grammar ' | </term> consists of a <term> lexicon </term> | #19588 The' grammar ' consists of a lexicon where each lexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is the head. | |
| lr,7-4-H89-1036,ak | <term> ' grammar ' </term> consists of a <term> | lexicon | </term> where each <term> lexical item </term> | #19594 The 'grammar' consists of alexicon where each lexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is the head. | |
| other,10-4-H89-1036,ak | of a <term> lexicon </term> where each <term> | lexical item | </term> is associated with a finite number | #19597 The 'grammar' consists of a lexicon where eachlexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is the head. | |
| other,26-4-H89-1036,ak | structures for which that item is the <term> | head | </term> . There are no separate <term> grammar | #19613 The 'grammar' consists of a lexicon where each lexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is thehead. | |
| model,4-5-H89-1036,ak | head </term> . There are no separate <term> | grammar rules | </term> . There are , of course , <term> ' | #19619 There are no separategrammar rules. | |
| model,6-6-H89-1036,ak | rules </term> . There are , of course , <term> | ' rules ' | </term> which tell us how these structures | #19628 There are, of course,' rules ' which tell us how these structures are composed. | |
| lr,1-7-H89-1036,ak | these structures are composed . A <term> | grammar | </term> of this form will be said to be ' | #19641 Agrammar of this form will be said to be 'lexicalized'. | |
| lr,1-8-H89-1036,ak | be said to be ' lexicalized ' . A <term> | ' lexicalized ' grammar | </term> naturally follows from the <term> extended | #19655 A' lexicalized ' grammar naturally follows from the extended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| other,9-8-H89-1036,ak | grammar </term> naturally follows from the <term> | extended domain of locality | </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . A general <term> | #19663 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from theextended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| tech,14-8-H89-1036,ak | extended domain of locality </term> of <term> | TAGs | </term> . A general <term> parsing strategy | #19668 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from the extended domain of locality ofTAGs. | |
| tech,2-9-H89-1036,ak | </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . A general <term> | parsing strategy | </term> for <term> ' lexicalized ' grammars | #19672 A generalparsing strategy for 'lexicalized' grammars is discussed. | |
| lr,5-9-H89-1036,ak | general <term> parsing strategy </term> for <term> | ' lexicalized ' grammars | </term> is discussed . In the first stage | #19675 A general parsing strategy for' lexicalized ' grammars is discussed. |
