| tech,24-1-C90-3046,ak | Japanese sentence analyses using an <term> | argumentation system | </term> by Konolige , which is a formalization | #20641 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using anargumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility. | |
| other,39-1-C90-3046,ak | defeasible reasoning </term> , that includes <term> | arguments | </term> and <term> defeat rules </term> that | #20656 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includesarguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility. | |
| other,45-1-C90-3046,ak | <term> defeat rules </term> that capture <term> | defeasibility | </term> . <term> Manual acquisition </term> of | #20662 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capturedefeasibility. | |
| tech,10-1-C90-3046,ak | analysis </term> should be treated as <term> | defeasible reasoning | </term> , and presents such a treatment for | #20627 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated asdefeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility. | |
| tech,34-1-C90-3046,ak | Konolige , which is a formalization of <term> | defeasible reasoning | </term> , that includes <term> arguments </term> | #20651 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization ofdefeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility. | |
| model,41-1-C90-3046,ak | includes <term> arguments </term> and <term> | defeat rules | </term> that capture <term> defeasibility </term> | #20658 This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments anddefeat rules that capture defeasibility. | |
| tech,4-1-C90-3046,ak | interpretation . This paper proposes that <term> | sentence analysis | </term> should be treated as <term> defeasible | #20621 This paper proposes thatsentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility. |
