| tech,4-1-C88-2160,ak | missing fragments . A new approach for <term> | Interactive Machine Translation | </term> where the author interacts during | #18489 A new approach forInteractive Machine Translation where the author interacts during the creation or the modification of the document is proposed. | |
| other,19-1-C88-2160,ak | creation or the modification of the <term> | document | </term> is proposed . The explanation of | #18504 A new approach for Interactive Machine Translation where the author interacts during the creation or the modification of thedocument is proposed. | |
| other,4-2-C88-2160,ak | is proposed . The explanation of an <term> | ambiguity | </term> or an <term> error </term> for the purposes | #18512 The explanation of anambiguity or an error for the purposes of correction does not use any concepts of the underlying linguistic theory: it is a reformulation of the erroneous or ambiguous sentence. | |
| other,7-2-C88-2160,ak | explanation of an <term> ambiguity </term> or an <term> | error | </term> for the purposes of correction does | #18515 The explanation of an ambiguity or anerror for the purposes of correction does not use any concepts of the underlying linguistic theory: it is a reformulation of the erroneous or ambiguous sentence. | |
| other,21-2-C88-2160,ak | use any concepts of the underlying <term> | linguistic theory | </term> : it is a reformulation of the <term> | #18529 The explanation of an ambiguity or an error for the purposes of correction does not use any concepts of the underlyinglinguistic theory: it is a reformulation of the erroneous or ambiguous sentence. | |
| other,30-2-C88-2160,ak | </term> : it is a reformulation of the <term> | erroneous or ambiguous sentence | </term> . The interaction is limited to the | #18538 The explanation of an ambiguity or an error for the purposes of correction does not use any concepts of the underlying linguistic theory: it is a reformulation of theerroneous or ambiguous sentence. | |
| other,6-3-C88-2160,ak | The interaction is limited to the <term> | analysis step of the translation process | </term> . This paper presents a new interactive | #18549 The interaction is limited to theanalysis step of the translation process. | |
| model,6-4-C88-2160,ak | This paper presents a new interactive <term> | disambiguation scheme | </term> based on the <term> paraphrasing </term> | #18562 This paper presents a new interactivedisambiguation scheme based on the paraphrasing of a parser's multiple output. | |
| tech,11-4-C88-2160,ak | disambiguation scheme </term> based on the <term> | paraphrasing | </term> of a <term> parser 's </term> multiple | #18567 This paper presents a new interactive disambiguation scheme based on theparaphrasing of a parser's multiple output. | |
| tech,14-4-C88-2160,ak | on the <term> paraphrasing </term> of a <term> | parser 's | </term> multiple <term> output </term> . Some | #18570 This paper presents a new interactive disambiguation scheme based on the paraphrasing of aparser 's multiple output. | |
| other,17-4-C88-2160,ak | of a <term> parser 's </term> multiple <term> | output | </term> . Some examples of paraphrasing <term> | #18573 This paper presents a new interactive disambiguation scheme based on the paraphrasing of a parser's multipleoutput. | |
| other,4-5-C88-2160,ak | </term> . Some examples of paraphrasing <term> | ambiguous sentences | </term> are presented . Computer programs | #18579 Some examples of paraphrasingambiguous sentences are presented. |
